News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The case for induction cooking by ksec on Saturday March 12, 2022 @11:31PM (#30657974)
So they are lying, again? ( Edit: Apparently not, refers to the context here https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30658022 )

What are normal people suppose to do without expertise on any subject.

Not against induction cooking but It is very common for these type of reporting that for induction cooking to succeed they must get rid of every single gas stove. And make gas stove cooking as evil. Start a movement, conjure a trend, make hype.

Re:The case for induction cooking by worik on Saturday March 12, 2022 @11:47PM (#30658058)
Induction cooking has been around a very long time, competing with gas.

What has changed?

I am getting one when I get a new stove, but then again I do not have reticulated gas here.

My mother had one and it was great

Re:The case for induction cooking by dtgriscom on Sunday March 13, 2022 @09:54AM (#30661216)
For the others about to Google this: "Reticulated gas is LPG distributed by a network of pipes. These pipes are connected to a storage vessel away from the customers site and multiple customers are serviced from one storage vessel."
Re:The case for induction cooking by wutbrodo on Saturday March 12, 2022 @11:50PM (#30658077)
> So they are lying, again? What are normal people suppose to do without expertise on any subject.

This is unfortunately just how the world is. Epistemology is hard, and there are a ton of people out there who make it harder (Three guesses as to whether the author of this article, or any other crappy prestige-publication journalist, thinks they're lying).

It's a scary and confusing world! At some level you just have to internalize that, build the most accurate model that's worth the overhead, and accept that you'll be wrong a lot.

Re:The case for induction cooking by golem14 on Sunday March 13, 2022 @04:20AM (#30659124)
Off-topic, but another area where it seems hard to get good answers is what cooking oil is actually best. E.g., palm oil / coconut oil gets hyped lately, but is it really healthy (in a meaningful way)? Is it gentle on the environment (very likely not).

The industries (merchants of doubt) are so active, it's absolutely nontrivial for a well meaning layman not wanting to invest oddles of time to get to good conclusions.

Re:The case for induction cooking by Aeolos on Sunday March 13, 2022 @07:10AM (#30660190)
Just use olive oil for everything except deep frying. It really is the best, and what is used by high end restaurants almost exclusively.

The smoking point is not a problem, the nasty stuff start appearing as couple dozen degrees _above_ the smoking point, so you can use that as an early warning system.

It also contains antioxidants, which bind some of the nasty stuff for a while, so it really is better for you for regular cooking.

Re:The case for induction cooking by dataduck on Sunday March 13, 2022 @07:57AM (#30660471)
> The smoking point is not a problem

Could not disagree more. Olive oil will be spewing smoke and changing flavour well before you get to a sensible temperature for shallow or stir frying. It is very tasty and apparently quite good for you, so it's a great choice for low-temperature cooking, but anywhere smoking point is important, olive oil is not what you're looking for.

Re:The case for induction cooking by Aeolos on Saturday March 26, 2022 @08:46AM (#30811364)
That's a different point though: the fact that it tastes different does not mean it is harmful to consume (which is the point I was trying to make).