Re:Russia opens criminal investigation of Meta over death ca...
by themgt on Friday March 11, 2022 @01:13PM
(#30643729)
"Completely objective and fair rules are impossible, so Calvinball it is" is not a credible stance.
Facebook's big recent decisions have been:
* posting news articles about Hunter Biden's laptop: banned
* posting about possible Covid lab leak: banned
* calling for death of Russians: thumbs up
* praising Azov neo-Nazis: thumbs up
Their consistent and comprehensive principle is just serving TPTB. Let's not dress it up beyond that.
Re:Russia opens criminal investigation of Meta over death ca...
by xdennis on Friday March 11, 2022 @01:18PM
(#30643811)
> calling for death of Russians: thumbs up
As always, disinformation. It's specifically for "Russian invaders".
Re:Russia opens criminal investigation of Meta over death ca...
by KerrAvon on Friday March 11, 2022 @01:10PM
(#30643687)
I don't necessarily disagree with your larger point, but I don't think the picture you're thinking of is actually worth making a hypothetical exception for, FWIW. The genre of which it is a member is censored regularly on all platforms. Just be consistent and point to the rules and live with the ridicule.
Re:Russia opens criminal investigation of Meta over death ca...
by nindalf on Friday March 11, 2022 @02:43PM
(#30645059)
Well you are ok with that picture being censored but many others aren’t. You’re proving my point, it’s impossible to please everyone. Everyone has different standards.
- Fury over Facebook 'Napalm girl' censorship (https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-37318031.amp).
In reality what you might find is that even some obvious rules like “no naked pictures of obvious minors (<10 years) should be allowed” have exceptions to it. And if you can’t reason why this is true (I’m thinking of a specific picture), then at least admit the task you’re implying is trivial is harder than it looks.