Re:I have formally accepted the CEO job at Cruise once again
by fieldcny on Monday February 28, 2022 @05:55PM
(#30506314)
Just to state the obvious, that assumes other sensors are net additive.
I’m not sure how valid an assumption that is, they could wind up just adding complexity and creating noise.
Re:I have formally accepted the CEO job at Cruise once again
by Dylan16807 on Monday February 28, 2022 @06:22PM
(#30506612)
You don't have to remove sensors to write code that way.
And what if the best answer is being extremely good at lidar-only and then adding in cameras on top.
Re:I have formally accepted the CEO job at Cruise once again
by freshpots on Monday February 28, 2022 @06:43PM
(#30506834)
They should still have radar to see through fog/rain but they abandoned it, as Green said: https://twitter.com/greentheonly/status/1496575861822267403
now is a terrible time to buy a new Tesla car.
But I do realize not everybody can wait it out
Re:I have formally accepted the CEO job at Cruise once again
by benatkin on Monday February 28, 2022 @08:10PM
(#30507785)
> You don't have to remove sensors to write code that way.
I think that's debatable. There are plenty of stories of trying to force an outcome of a big software project and things not going as expected.
https://medium.com/@herbcaudill/lessons-from-6-software-rewr...
I've always read it as Tesla trying to do a paradigm leap. It seems everyone in self-driving knows you can do it pretty well with a huge variety of sensors, but what if you got extremely good at only camera-based then added in the new sensors.
Basically, if you can establish that the very worst case works, you can add in more sensors to go beyond that and have the cars become superhuman rather than having to depend on all sensors to consistently be working to have a safe vehicle.