Unless your an L1 transfer, you can still change jobs fairly easily on an H1B, because everyone else in tech is also willing to do H1B transfer paperwork. So you can quit, it just takes longer...

And even as an L1, you can still apply at other jobs, because they will apply for the H1B for you and if successful, hire you then.

So yes between the waiting periods you do have to keep it up, but the barriers are not that high compared to citizens otherwise.

And this is my personal experience as a visa worker.

The issue is the Greencard sponsoring through EB-3. You have to wait till the process reaches i-140 or I-485 or otherwise you have to restart the process. This is worse for Indian and Chinese citizens due to their priority date from the 7% rule.

At least in my day if you changed the employer without changing the role you didn’t lose your place in line after PERM application was completed. I knew many Indians/Chinese nationals who changed several jobs while waiting EB2/3 to come through.

Frankly I think green card golden handcuffs are heavily played up in these discussions to advance a specific narrative

Yeah the start to perm process to get your priority number is a 6 month - 1 year thing, and you only really need to do it once. And once your priority date is up maybe you have to stay there for 1 year.

Your info on how long it takes is out of date (edit: at least for companies not large enough to "optimize" the process; see comment below mine).

First, PERM currently takes about 16-18 months now. Processing times are way up: the PWD (Prevailing Wage Determination) phase alone is now 6 months; PERM certification itself is another 6 months (source: https://flag.dol.gov/processingtimes). To this you have add ~3 months for the recruitment phase, plus however many weeks/months it takes management and the lawyers to work out the job description. If you're audited (which I can tell from personal experience can happen for the most straightforward cases), that adds 4 months.

What's worse is that, as per our law firms briefing, due to a recent lawsuit that Facebook lost, companies now have to be more conservative with the recruitment phase (make a much stronger effort to find Americans). And with that, the recruitment phase should be expected to "fail" (from the perspective of the potential immigrant) more often, which can multiply the PWD and recruitment phase time.

This means that going forward, all in all it could take several years to get to PERM approved. If you switch jobs before you've filed I-140, gotten it approved and waited out 6 months (for portability under AC21), that resets the progress. Also note some companies like to delay starting the process until a few months after the employee starts working for them.

Now remember that the maximum duration of an H-1B (without an approved I-140) is 6 years (5 years for L-1B). So there's definitely a bit of time pressure which makes changing jobs somewhat risky. Possible, but not a decision made lightly.

You are correct that you only need to do it once... as long as your job duties stay within 50% of what your original job description was. If it was somewhat specialized, and the immigrant changes jobs, then they incur some amount of risk of an I-485 denial later.

Just a nit, really: this is true at smaller companies but many bigger companies have a "batch PERM" system such that individuals essentially skip the wage determination and recruitment steps. See e.g. [1]. In such cases hiring to PERM approval is 7-11 months.

[1] https://www.teamblind.com/post/Which-companies-have-a-BATCH-...

So not really that different from 10 yrs ago when it took me roughly 6 months. The processing time for everything in uscis is longer now - can take up to a year a longer to stamp n400

+1. I was on H1B Visa for a decade (6 + 4). Worked at Amazon (AWS networking) for 5 of those years and changed jobs 4 times in those 10 years. I honestly loved working at Amazon, job was challenging, learnt so much because people around me were incredibly smart, and this job practically gave me a career. I moved back to India last year though and now given the cost of living here, I don't have to work if I don't want to for the rest of my life.

I think you are generalizing Amazon to the rest of the tech world. AFAICT, Amazon appears to be uniquely problematic in this regard.

> it boggles my mind anyone would invest so much energy in getting a job at Amazon.

If they can sponsor a visa... just consider the sort of poverty that exists in much of the rest of the world.

My firm (non-FAANG) does it too. It's like indentured servitude and it's awful.

I’ve never worked at Amazon but this seems to be a common theme with interview candidates who work there. They talk about to burnout and stressful on-calls shifts. I’m not sure how this unfolds for Amazon in the long run.

They're already having problems with hiring. I get pinged by one or two amazon recruiters DAILY. Literally, not even exaggerating here.

The entire post is about how a specialized course is required to pass a technical interview in companies like Amazon and here you are making a comment that implies desperate Indians are hired with zero qualifications for the job only because they are desperate.

I can't comment on the working conditions at Amazon but I have to say that those Indians must be highly qualified to have that job and should be paid fairly.

> here you are making a comment that implies desperate Indians are hired with zero qualifications for the job only because they are desperate

I’m not implying Indians are desperate. Plenty of Indians work all across the American economy and contribute as much as any other ethnicity. I’m making a claim about Amazon hiring practices, especially with Indian transfers. Amazon pays below other top tech companies, and we paid Indian transfers at the bottom of our own pay scale.

I’m not making any claim on these Indian people’s technical qualifications. Between two different candidates, a corporation goes with the one that they can get away with paying less. That’s the reality.

Based on your name, I assume your Indian. If you’re offended, don’t attack the messenger. Your issue is with corporate America.

Those Indians are indeed qualified people and amazon also pays well enough. I don't know what the OP is comparing to when he/she says pay is low.

Amazon is an exception in the industry as they routinely hire from tier-2 & tier-3 engineering universities. On the contrary, Product Managers come from tier-1 MBAs. My hypothesis is that given Amazon's strong emphasis on engineering processes, they are able to train and uplevel these devs to tier-1 level talent over time.

The pay for a new grad (even non US citizens) entering Amazon is 120k+. This not low at all. It should not be mind boggling why someone would choose to interview at Amazon.

$120K is on the low end and nothing to brag about in Seattle, WA or in the Bay Area. It’s also quite a bit less than other tech companies.

>Interviewing is broken.

Nothing you describe suggests to me that it was the interviewing that was broken, it sounds like the employment was broken.