Re:Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, Feb 26, 2022
by kilroy123 on Saturday February 26, 2022 @09:49PM
(#30484870)
This is correct. Putin has seen Ukraine turn more and more westward. Flirting and thinking about joining the EU and NATO. Which would mean "NATO" (US) troops right over the board and mere hours away form Moscow. Simply unacceptable to Putin.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, Feb 26, 2022
by indymike on Saturday February 26, 2022 @10:13PM
(#30485019)
I'm pretty sure if Ukraine survives this, they will be NATO members quickly.
Re:Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, Feb 26, 2022
by themacguffinman on Sunday February 27, 2022 @12:54AM
(#30485778)
Only if Ukraine somehow also quickly recovers the territory it lost in 2014. NATO requires that new members have zero disputed territories before they join because territorial disputes could immediately force NATO to intervene.
Re:Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, Feb 26, 2022
by indymike on Sunday February 27, 2022 @09:14AM
(#30488585)
Exceptions will be made. This situation was created by this rule and inflexible administration.
Re:Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, Feb 26, 2022
by will4274 on Sunday February 27, 2022 @03:18PM
(#30492073)
Ukraine also has a Nazi problem. Putin used it as a pretext for this war inside Russia, but outside of wartime, folks in Berlin and DC consider it a real problem for closer alliance too.
Ukraine also has a corruption problem.
I think NATO will keep Ukraine on the cusp for 20 years like they did with Romania, before they allow them to join.
Re:Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, Feb 26, 2022
by indymike on Sunday February 27, 2022 @05:36PM
(#30493456)
You could say that about the US, too.
Re:Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, Feb 26, 2022
by rootusrootus on Saturday February 26, 2022 @09:54PM
(#30484900)
Aren't there NATO countries right next to Ukraine that are just as close to Moscow already? Having Ukraine join NATO would be a bitter pill to swallow, perhaps, but it wouldn't bring NATO any closer than it is today.
And madman though Putin may seem to be, he knows NATO isn't an offensive organization.
Re:Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, Feb 26, 2022
by Thorrez on Sunday February 27, 2022 @01:05AM
(#30485822)
363 miles from Latvia to Moscow, 280 miles from Ukraine to Moscow. I'm not sure if I would call Latvia "right next to Ukraine", since it doesn't border Ukraine.
Re:Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, Feb 26, 2022
by rootusrootus on Sunday February 27, 2022 @01:02PM
(#30490754)
Maybe in Europe that feels like a meaningful difference, but to me, 80 miles is nothing. Belarus is the odd one out. Poland, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, all NATO members. Having Ukraine becoming a NATO member would not present a meaningful strategic change, it's 100% just a personal thing.
Re:Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, Feb 26, 2022
by AnimalMuppet on Saturday February 26, 2022 @11:53PM
(#30485531)
Not as close to Moscow, no. They're closer to St. Petersburg, though.
And I'm going to judge Putin by his own words. He says he's threatened by NATO on his borders? Then he shouldn't have 70% of his military on the border of Ukraine. It leaves him wide open to an invasion from NATO members Estonia and Latvia.
Re:Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, Feb 26, 2022
by gred on Saturday February 26, 2022 @11:43PM
(#30485473)
> And madman though Putin may seem to be, he knows NATO isn't an offensive organization.
I think he may legit see it that way: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MOkl2XgZlw0
Re:Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, Feb 26, 2022
by VictorPath on Saturday February 26, 2022 @10:32PM
(#30485131)
> And madman though Putin may seem to be, he knows NATO isn't an offensive organization
Sure, like the defensive bombing of Libya by NATO.