Re:Strange plant-like formation captured by Curiosity rover ...
by dschuetz on Saturday February 26, 2022 @04:16AM
(#30476268)
It looks like an old mineral crystal. "Strange plant-like" sounds very amateurish and does not reflect facts.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Strange plant-like formation captured by Curiosity rover ...
by mrtksn on Saturday February 26, 2022 @06:33AM
(#30476776)
It looks like a plant in my opinion, which doesn't mean it is necessarily a plant but it means that its appearance is like a plant. I don't see any inaccuracies in the description.
Of course if someone thinks that doesn't look like a plant but crystal or an animal, they are fre to describe it as "crystal-like" or "animal-like".
Its alright bo be impressed with its looks I guess, noone is going to make a salad of it, so it is not dangerous to think that it looks like a plant.
Re:Strange plant-like formation captured by Curiosity rover ...
by cocomutator on Saturday February 26, 2022 @08:23AM
(#30477314)
I shall learn from this post how to disagree respectfully on the internet. Hats off.
Re:Strange plant-like formation captured by Curiosity rover ...
by wrycoder on Saturday February 26, 2022 @08:54AM
(#30477571)
There must be a Latin name for “plant-like” that could have been used. Maybe “anomalous herbiform entity”. But, I’m poor at crosswords.
Re:Strange plant-like formation captured by Curiosity rover ...
by HeyLaughingBoy on Saturday February 26, 2022 @10:34AM
(#30478367)
And then there are those of us who just prefer plain English. Using Latin in a publication aimed at laypeople sounds pretentious.
Re:Strange plant-like formation captured by Curiosity rover ...
by embedded_hiker on Saturday February 26, 2022 @11:15AM
(#30478795)
This reminds me of when I heard the phrase "lenticular cloud". I looked it up, hoping to learn something about how these clouds are formed, etc. It simply means "shaped like a lentil".
Re:Strange plant-like formation captured by Curiosity rover ...
by Hallucinaut on Saturday February 26, 2022 @04:25PM
(#30482105)
Perhaps this is autocorrect gone awry, but it has nothing to do with lentils.
Not a meteorologist, but from all I understand it means lens-shaped, and to me that immediately gives a strong clue as to how they form since lenses have focal points and can, to some degree, have shapes expressed as formulae about some origin. Which to me is suggestive of the relation to the mountains around which they form.
Re:Strange plant-like formation captured by Curiosity rover ...
by ncmncm on Saturday February 26, 2022 @05:05PM
(#30482424)
"Lentil" is itself a reference to its lens-like shape, same as the cloud. "Lenticular" has nothing in it suggestive of legumes.
Re:Strange plant-like formation captured by Curiosity rover ...
by wrycoder on Saturday February 26, 2022 @12:41PM
(#30479771)
Yeah! I submitted this awhile back:
Re:Strange plant-like formation captured by Curiosity rover ...
by Qem on Saturday February 26, 2022 @06:58AM
(#30476872)
Looks more like a coral.
Re:Strange plant-like formation captured by Curiosity rover ...
by mrtksn on Saturday February 26, 2022 @07:08AM
(#30476927)
I agree, I often forget that corals are not plants(but they look like plants, which probably means that the Mars rock that look like a coral also looks like a plant).
Re:Strange plant-like formation captured by Curiosity rover ...
by DFHippie on Saturday February 26, 2022 @09:45AM
(#30477945)
And they act like plants: they photosynthesize; they are sessile; and they are structured as a thin layer of living tissue over a dead, rigid internal support.
Re:Strange plant-like formation captured by Curiosity rover ...
by blacksmith_tb on Saturday February 26, 2022 @01:29PM
(#30480262)
I could see that, or a sea sponge[1]
1: https://study.com/academy/lesson/sea-sponge-lesson-for-kids....
Re:Strange plant-like formation captured by Curiosity rover ...
by darepublic on Saturday February 26, 2022 @08:56AM
(#30477584)
Saying plant vs crystal makes it more click bait.
Re:Strange plant-like formation captured by Curiosity rover ...
by dvh on Sunday February 27, 2022 @09:51AM
(#30488938)
I think he got offended because he understood "plant-like" in a functional sense (e.g. that it uses photosynthesis), maybe "plant-shaped" would be more accurate.
Re:Strange plant-like formation captured by Curiosity rover ...
by weare138 on Sunday February 27, 2022 @01:19AM
(#30485884)
Reminds me of coral.
Re:Strange plant-like formation captured by Curiosity rover ...
by Vox_Leone on Saturday February 26, 2022 @09:47AM
(#30477953)
Stalagmite-like formation would also be an accurate description, without the hype. The abuse of bombastic announcements like this one does a disservice to science in general and the space exploration in particular. This gotta stop.
Re:Strange plant-like formation captured by Curiosity rover ...
by gnabgib on Saturday February 26, 2022 @11:16AM
(#30478803)
There's no bombastic announcement, it's a link to an image that op made an opinionated title for.
Re:Strange plant-like formation captured by Curiosity rover ...
by Vox_Leone on Saturday February 26, 2022 @05:21PM
(#30482536)
Plant-like is bombastic. Sorry.