Not a single time did we have a meeting on Teams that worked properly. Not once.
Guess that’s not everyone’s experience?
I would also consider joining a company in the future that doesn't use teams as a form of communication.
[1]: the 100% CPU, the fan noise in the background of many peoples calls, the 500-2500ms lag between clicks and a screen update, the UX disaster of teams vs chats vs private channels, etc.
Teams in comparison is heaven video and chat together... Wow. Of course it eats processing power like hungry, is slow and requires thrid party cookies.
Try make a header or footer and edit it in one of the other apps MS offers.
Try edit or move an image.
Try work out how much text fits on a page.
It’s incredible how much market share teams has achieved with such poor functionality for basic tasks.
My brief use of Teams (granted, like 3 years ago) put it firmly in the latter category. God that UI was a mess.
I will never work for any company that uses Teams as their internal communication tool again.
I'm done talking about "admins who set up groups wrong", or indicators that I'm holding it wrong...
I feel very strongly that Teams is a consequence of a company that doesn't care what it inflicts on workers, regardless of price.
The way teams shoves itself down my throat (we do not use teams at my current company and it was one of the reasons I moved here) is astonishing too[0].
So, no, Teams is not "pretty good".
[0]: https://blog.dijit.sh/teams-microsoft-monopoly