News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on On Wordle, the NYT, and Antitrust. Parent comment

Re:On Wordle, the NYT, and Antitrust by dTal on Tuesday February 01, 2022 @07:04PM (#30171635)
I note that all future Wordle words are already known, so it would be trivial to make a "compatible" Wordle.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:On Wordle, the NYT, and Antitrust by omnicognate on Tuesday February 01, 2022 @07:16PM (#30171739)
Trivial and, presumably, illegal.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:On Wordle, the NYT, and Antitrust by zeroonetwothree on Tuesday February 01, 2022 @07:31PM (#30171881)
How could it possibly be illegal? There is no IP protection for Date % words.length
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:On Wordle, the NYT, and Antitrust by pseudalopex on Tuesday February 01, 2022 @07:53PM (#30172073)
Copyright. Wardle and his partner chose the words.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:On Wordle, the NYT, and Antitrust by omnicognate on Tuesday February 01, 2022 @08:13PM (#30172212)
That's what I'd expect, copyright on the word list. However, IANAL and I would love to see some proper analysis on the legal status of clones, especially identical ones with the same word list.

You can have a perfect clone of wordle running in a couple of minutes, but I'm certain that would be copyright infringement.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:On Wordle, the NYT, and Antitrust by heckerhut on Tuesday February 01, 2022 @09:43PM (#30172963)
There is a copyright on databases for exactly that reason.
[ Parent | on HN ]