I note that all future Wordle words are already known, so it would be trivial to make a "compatible" Wordle.
Re:On Wordle, the NYT, and Antitrust
by omnicognate on Tuesday February 01, 2022 @07:16PM
(#30171739)
Trivial and, presumably, illegal.
Re:On Wordle, the NYT, and Antitrust
by zeroonetwothree on Tuesday February 01, 2022 @07:31PM
(#30171881)
How could it possibly be illegal? There is no IP protection for Date % words.length
Re:On Wordle, the NYT, and Antitrust
by pseudalopex on Tuesday February 01, 2022 @07:53PM
(#30172073)
Copyright. Wardle and his partner chose the words.
Re:On Wordle, the NYT, and Antitrust
by omnicognate on Tuesday February 01, 2022 @08:13PM
(#30172212)
That's what I'd expect, copyright on the word list. However, IANAL and I would love to see some proper analysis on the legal status of clones, especially identical ones with the same word list.
You can have a perfect clone of wordle running in a couple of minutes, but I'm certain that would be copyright infringement.
There is a copyright on databases for exactly that reason.
Re:On Wordle, the NYT, and Antitrust
by notjustanymike on Tuesday February 01, 2022 @07:32PM
(#30171891)
Exactly. They paid a million bucks for the free marketing and built in audience. They're buying the audience.
The act of whipping up a quick clone, while a a balm to the ego and a fun exercise for junior devs, does not recreate the social phenomenon.