News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:AirPods don't “just work” by bsder on Wednesday January 26, 2022 @04:23PM (#30092099)
Except that requirement IS crazy--when you put all the other stuff around it.

Must work at 2.4Ghz--even in the face of 200 WiFi access points and 3 times that number of devices.

Must stay in sync to within a millisecond ... even though there is a large bag of RF absorbing water in between them.

Should work on a battery smaller than a thumbnail.

Should process audio but not generate enough heat that you notice it in your ear.

I can go on. The engineering requirements are quite severe.

... for something that we can do with a 10 cent wire, ironically.

Re:AirPods don't “just work” by Dylan16807 on Wednesday January 26, 2022 @10:52PM (#30095980)
> Must work at 2.4Ghz--even in the face of 200 WiFi access points and 3 times that number of devices.

At low range and less than 1/100 the speed of wifi.

> Must stay in sync to within a millisecond

If you have a working data connection at all, that level of sync is trivial. It only takes a few bits to align things, and they use pretty big buffers.

> even though there is a large bag of RF absorbing water in between them

That's hard.

> Should work on a battery smaller than a thumbnail.

That part is quite hard. But also it doesn't apply to over-ear headphones.

> Should process audio but not generate enough heat that you notice it in your ear.

I'm skeptical of that part being hard. How many milliwatts do those codecs take? Also once you add the battery constraints then the heat levels solve themselves.

Re:AirPods don't “just work” by jonwinstanley on Wednesday January 26, 2022 @05:24PM (#30092953)
So true, we take the complexity for granted. It's actually a really hard problem.