This probably won't get you past the requirement of utility bills in your name at that address to get a "Real ID" that allows domestic flights without a passport, though.
Same thing for getting a PO box, you need a physical address first. The post office will tell you the same thing, to use the address of a homeless shelter.
The folks writing these laws do not live in vans, and do not care, nor even think about the impact of their actions on folks with alternative living arrangements / folks poorer than they are.
Like, what if you are a millionaire living in a fancy RV driving around national parks for a couple years?
At the very least you can definitely get your bank statements sent there ...
Now you have a residence address and utility bills in your name to your residence address, and you can get a driver's license there, just like a real boy.
Is there a $100/mo closet I can rent for that purpose or does it have to be $500/mo bedroom? What's the smallest one can go?
Do you really think wealthy people (who are naturally at risk of kidnapping, extortion, blackmail, threats against family, etc) have their driver's license address pointing to the place where their children sleep at night?
The DMV gives those records in bulk to third parties. It's as good as public. Additionally, every dumbfuck services vendor from a gym to a daycare to a doctor's office will demand to photocopy your ID card to provide service, and you can be damn well sure that they aren't doing a good job protecting that information. They're storing it on their malware-ridden front desk Windows computer along with everyone else's.
As far as $100/mo vs $500/mo: what's the difference? It's all under $10k/year. Who cares?
Presenting, and having infraction points assigned to, different licenses for traffic offenses.
Using nonresident states to avoid license restrictions in the state of residency.
I know many people don't want us to risk becoming a "show your papers" country, but A) We already kinda are (ever been pulled over?), and B) It just makes more sense to have something like ID be centralized, preferably with a much better model then SSN's.
1. The ACLU-style left fear it will lead to more pervasive, easier surveillance, and more "papers please" style checks on poor people and immigrants.
2. The right hates it because it's an extension of government power, arguably a 10th amendment violation, and it would greatly simplify voting for people who traditionally vote democrat.
3. A nontrivial number of people believe (no-joke) that it would be a portent of the apocalypse, relating to the number of the beast in the book of revelation. This actually came up in a number of state legislatures as they standardized drivers licenses after 9/11.
The few polls I've ever seen actually say it's fairly popular with people, but those interest groups are non trivial.
People mainly rely on their state drivers licenses because states regulate driving. (And most other day-to-day government interactions that require ID)
If you’re the authority asking for ID, you get to decide which one to ask for.
Also, there are collisions.
Also why does the DMV need a proof of residence? What if you live in a van?