News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Starlink satellites hindering detection of near-Earth ast... by gala8y on Friday January 21, 2022 @08:06AM (#30022920)
Few days ago I watched 'Debunking Starlink' video [0] (posted by @qsdf38100 in another thread [1] on Starlink) and it got me thinking. I am just a lay person, but, after watching it, am not so sure if Starlink is such a good idea.

[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2vuMzGhc1cg

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29975352

Re:Starlink satellites hindering detection of near-Earth ast... by ricardobeat on Friday January 21, 2022 @09:14AM (#30023713)
Might not want to take that at face value. I skipped through most of the video but it seems like a series of thoughtless jabs. The cost estimates are way off, ignores the fact commercial launch prices are a large multiple of the actual cost, ignores economics with Starship. It handwaves the fact that Starlink orbits are so low that the satellites naturally decay in 5 years, so no permanent space trash. Comparing the addressable market (telecom alone is already 2T) to average income per capita is pointless.. I stopped there. Too much of the "i am very smart" vibe.
Re:Starlink satellites hindering detection of near-Earth ast... by schiffern on Friday January 21, 2022 @03:01PM (#30029172)
De-debunk: https://old.reddit.com/r/Starlink/comments/rppkb5/very_well_...

You just described all of CommonSenseSkeptic's 'debunking' content (along with his predecessor Thunderfoot, who should've stuck with creationists and Kickscammers).

Lately I find the word "debunking"/"debunked" in a title is a high-reliability signal of low-quality content.

Re:Starlink satellites hindering detection of near-Earth ast... by WithinReason on Friday January 21, 2022 @04:21PM (#30030159)
> De-debunk

Rebunk? Anyway, Musk-hate seems to be becoming its own religion.

Re:Starlink satellites hindering detection of near-Earth ast... by qsdf38100 on Friday January 21, 2022 @08:32PM (#30032219)
How can people not hate him though? He is so full of shit and all his projects are a joke. He stole Tesla from its true founders and made it about self driving hype. He keeps making non sense claims about it and how it’s 1 year ahead. He generally can’t help coming up with more and more stupid ideas. I could just ignore him, but now everyone believes his bullshit even supposedly smart people on HN, and we keep hearing about futuristic revolution non sense such as hyper loop, underground taxi services, mars colonisation, rocket mass transportation, and now that star link is going to be a 12 in 1 techno marvel, best telescope, best gps, best internet provider, best weather instrument, a supercomputer, etc. Have no one heard about the fact that things that are to good to be true probably are? Elon seem to have achieved global alienation with his pseudo scientific scams and humanity is walking on its head supporting mars colonies and throwing 40000 satellites every 5 years, because we can. Meanwhile the earth is warming up and inequalities in the world is at its worst. But spoiled fans of grandiose science fiction (seemingly everyone) want moar of this giga star hyper AI sexy non sens. He is the Donald trump of the silicone valley, he represents everything that is wrong with the modern world. The car he sent to space was the car that was promised to Tesla true founder after he kicked him out. It was just a multi million dollar middle finger to the guy he stole from. Give me a break. Hope you enjoyed that nuanced take on the Elon situation.
Re:Starlink satellites hindering detection of near-Earth ast... by mlindner on Friday January 21, 2022 @08:51PM (#30032368)
> How can people not hate him though? He is so full of shit and all his projects are a joke.

I stopped here in reading your post but you're in a reality distortion field if you actually think this. Tesla and SpaceX have turned two industries on their head. And Tesla was actually in practice formed by him as the two founders were running it into the ground (Musk was there from day one as well, as chairman of the board). If you think Tesla would have succeeded without Musk, why did none of the other electrical vehicle startups then or since succeed?

Re:Starlink satellites hindering detection of near-Earth ast... by qsdf38100 on Saturday January 22, 2022 @01:08PM (#30039198)
That’s my point, other didn’t succeed because Elon alienated people with his promises of bringing the Hollywood blockbuster style future the masses dream of. It’s about time, where are the flying cars and hover boards. Why would one buy an boring car when one could have the car from the future from the man from the future. But it’s just a scam, teslas won’t drive themselves as it was promised, à la "driver is there only for legal reasons". It’s too late, the very people that got scammed are trusting his bullshit even more. No amount of facts will change their minds. Same as trump followers. He will achieve full self driving in 1 year with no lidar. He can do more with less. He can do everything with nothing.

Now how will other business compete? Will they need to go full bullshit to survive? Because in the end if lots of people buy, it’s a success, right? It’s just about money, who cares about truth and facts?

I think he is a terrible role model, and his "success" only proves that there’s a growing amount of people participating in a collective delusion. I’m sincerely worried.

Re:Starlink satellites hindering detection of near-Earth ast... by ricardobeat on Sunday January 23, 2022 @12:19PM (#30048004)
If making unfulfillable promises was a good strategy to put competitors out of business, you'd see this happen everywhere. It doesn't. In fact that's usually a surefire way to drive a business into the ground. You can make your own conclusions starting from there.

Also, Tesla is not alone: Volvo, Waymo, Daimler, GM, Ford, Mercedes, BMW, and chinese makers have all promised Level 4 self-driving around 2021-2022.

Re:Starlink satellites hindering detection of near-Earth ast... by qsdf38100 on Sunday January 23, 2022 @01:36PM (#30048911)
I appreciate your effort to reconcile me with the current world. I know I’m probably missing something when seemingly half of the world is loosing its mind. Maybe I am loosing my mind. But I can’t help getting infuriated with pseudo science commercial bullshit that turns out praised and making trillions of dollars. Hearing that other automakers are claiming the same 1 year ahead full self driving makes me wonder if they feel like they have to make the same bullshit claims to survive the next decade. Would Tesla have succeeded if they were marketing as electric cars with the usual driving assistances? I think the false claims of fully autonomous driving thanks to Super intelligent AI together with Elon cult of personality played a big role in Tesla success.
Re:Starlink satellites hindering detection of near-Earth ast... by ricardobeat on Saturday January 22, 2022 @07:26AM (#30036084)
There is a wide, wide gap between “believing his crap” and observing the first successful electric car uproot an entire industry, reusable spacecraft become commonplace, large-scale battery storage, and so on. Calling those a joke completely undermines any argument that follows.

And really, who cares that the CEO who was fired from Tesla didn’t get priority delivery, other than people looking for a match to light? It’s an inane discussion.

Re:Starlink satellites hindering detection of near-Earth ast... by qsdf38100 on Saturday January 22, 2022 @12:35PM (#30038821)
Tesla is successful because people are being told they will be able to sleep or work in their Tesla while it drives on its own. Like, you know, actually be allowed to take their hands of the driving wheel. Not now, but… very soon, so soon it worth 10k additional dollars. So, sure, I can’t deny Tesla success, but it’s a successful scam. And you people supporting that means what? Businesses should now be on the edge of being a scam to not be left behind by big mouth CEOs and their mindless followers? I don’t want to live in such a world. I want honesty, integrity and responsibility from the industry leaders. Elon is the opposite, and yet he’s touted as the savior of humanity. That’s gross.
Re:Starlink satellites hindering detection of near-Earth ast... by schiffern on Friday January 21, 2022 @04:36PM (#30030318)
Linguistically it's an awkward case. Currently, "debunked" (see also: "busted") is just the latest version of the phrase "scientists say X." The literal semantics and how it's actually used in practice are polar opposites. But "re-bunked" still sound like false information.

Right now the words are mainly used as a cheap way to sound like Carl Sagan or Mythbusters without any of the deep knowledge and research.

"De-debunked" IMO gets the message across, but also highlights the absurdity.

Re:Starlink satellites hindering detection of near-Earth ast... by shaklee3 on Saturday January 22, 2022 @12:44AM (#30034008)
every credible source I've seen has shown it's not going to make financial sense. so far the returns are extremely poor, and their user adds are far from where they wanted blame the supply shortage or whatever you want, but they're paying thousands of engineers during this time, and it's not making money. I can send more links if you're interested.
Re:Starlink satellites hindering detection of near-Earth ast... by viczsaszbo on Saturday January 22, 2022 @04:05AM (#30035002)
Right now nobody claims it's making money. Musk himself said gen 1 is "financially weak". They have 600k+ preorders and geo satellite people are very happy with it, which is a couple million users mostly in the US just from that. With 400 satellites per launch using Starship, Starlink looks much better financially. They plan on starting to launch Starship with Starlink this year. This reasonable analysis says about 3mil subscribers are needed without factoring in Starship.

https://littlebluena.substack.com/p/common-sense-skeptic-deb...

Re:Starlink satellites hindering detection of near-Earth ast... by shaklee3 on Saturday January 22, 2022 @09:24AM (#30036846)
starship is nowhere near ready to launch, and their Boca chica facility is now halted due to epa regulations
Re:Starlink satellites hindering detection of near-Earth ast... by viczsaszbo on Saturday January 22, 2022 @05:54PM (#30041634)
Actually, it is. It's expected to launch around Q2 2022. The NEPA FAA PEA is going to be decided upon on February 28th then if they get the greenlight a launch attempt will happen a couple months after that. For commercial launches, they are targeting 2023. Even if Starship gets delayed to 2023-24 it will still play a big roll in getting Starlink satellites up since they haven't started launching the gen 2 constellation yet.