Re:Crypto.com accounts had unauthorized withdrawals
by wpietri on Thursday January 20, 2022 @11:45AM
(#30011302)
That's a pretty funny definition of "legitimate". By that standard, all of this malware is legitimate too! https://github.com/ytisf/theZoo
Re:Crypto.com accounts had unauthorized withdrawals
by cuteboy19 on Thursday January 20, 2022 @12:16PM
(#30011718)
I'm sure someone can come up with some legitimate use for those. We came up with 'Linux isos' for torrents after all
Re:Crypto.com accounts had unauthorized withdrawals
by SilasX on Thursday January 20, 2022 @12:58PM
(#30012294)
How is it different from “TOR/some VPN is a legitimate service that happens to be used by some hackers to cover their tracks”?
Re:Crypto.com accounts had unauthorized withdrawals
by wpietri on Thursday January 20, 2022 @05:44PM
(#30016379)
How many legitimate uses can you name for TOR? And how many can you name for a money laundering service?
Re:Crypto.com accounts had unauthorized withdrawals
by poma on Friday January 21, 2022 @12:16PM
(#30026572)
If you don't need financial privacy can you please post your bank statement here for everyone to see?
Re:Crypto.com accounts had unauthorized withdrawals
by wpietri on Sunday January 23, 2022 @05:31PM
(#30051225)
That's quite an evasion of the question. Yet more evidence that there's approximately no legitimate use.
But I'm on record as being in favor of full financial transparency for everybody. Every charge, every bank statement. Money, after all, is inherently social. And full transparency, while causing some problems, would eliminate a ton of others. So if you can get a legislator to submit a bill, I'll happy call them up to back it.
Re:Crypto.com accounts had unauthorized withdrawals
by gilrain on Thursday January 20, 2022 @11:58AM
(#30011478)
I wonder what percentage of their total volume it is that “happens” to be used by hackers.
Re:Crypto.com accounts had unauthorized withdrawals
by sneak on Thursday January 20, 2022 @12:06PM
(#30011595)
People who are not criminals deserve transaction privacy, as well.
Re:Crypto.com accounts had unauthorized withdrawals
by lottin on Thursday January 20, 2022 @01:46PM
(#30012887)
What would be the point of "transaction privacy"?
Re:Crypto.com accounts had unauthorized withdrawals
by i67vw3 on Thursday January 20, 2022 @08:27PM
(#30017986)
Odd statement. It is on par that all your bank statement should be public and easily viewable. It is on par saying that people do need digital privacy at all, as they have nothing to hide. And those are trying to hide are really 'bad people'.
Monero/Zcash/Dash/Firo/etc are used by legitimate users to hide their transactions from public blockchain.
Re:Crypto.com accounts had unauthorized withdrawals
by lottin on Friday January 21, 2022 @10:00AM
(#30024364)
Your bank statement is not private, your bank has it. You can pay with cash, but the other customers can see you right there paying, so that's not private either. I understand the need for private communications, but private transactions don't seem to make a lot of sense.
Re:Crypto.com accounts had unauthorized withdrawals
by poma on Friday January 21, 2022 @12:14PM
(#30026529)
To avoid getting kidnapped and tortured because your crypto portfolio is visible to everyone?
There are plenty of examples of that: https://github.com/jlopp/physical-bitcoin-attacks
Re:Crypto.com accounts had unauthorized withdrawals
by KeAShizukuTio on Thursday January 20, 2022 @02:15PM
(#30013301)
Haha tell that to the IRS they'd love it.
Check out their code on github.