Re:Crypto.com accounts had unauthorized withdrawals
by wpietri on Thursday January 20, 2022 @11:45AM
(#30011302)
That's a pretty funny definition of "legitimate". By that standard, all of this malware is legitimate too! https://github.com/ytisf/theZoo
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Crypto.com accounts had unauthorized withdrawals
by cuteboy19 on Thursday January 20, 2022 @12:16PM
(#30011718)
I'm sure someone can come up with some legitimate use for those. We came up with 'Linux isos' for torrents after all
Re:Crypto.com accounts had unauthorized withdrawals
by SilasX on Thursday January 20, 2022 @12:58PM
(#30012294)
How is it different from “TOR/some VPN is a legitimate service that happens to be used by some hackers to cover their tracks”?
Re:Crypto.com accounts had unauthorized withdrawals
by wpietri on Thursday January 20, 2022 @05:44PM
(#30016379)
How many legitimate uses can you name for TOR? And how many can you name for a money laundering service?
Re:Crypto.com accounts had unauthorized withdrawals
by poma on Friday January 21, 2022 @12:16PM
(#30026572)
If you don't need financial privacy can you please post your bank statement here for everyone to see?
Re:Crypto.com accounts had unauthorized withdrawals
by wpietri on Sunday January 23, 2022 @05:31PM
(#30051225)
That's quite an evasion of the question. Yet more evidence that there's approximately no legitimate use.
But I'm on record as being in favor of full financial transparency for everybody. Every charge, every bank statement. Money, after all, is inherently social. And full transparency, while causing some problems, would eliminate a ton of others. So if you can get a legislator to submit a bill, I'll happy call them up to back it.