News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Eyeo wins German copyright decision, sets legal precedent... by detaro on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @11:28AM (#29981528)
Huh? What does eyeo have to do with uBlock? Adblock plus is their thing.
Re:Eyeo wins German copyright decision, sets legal precedent... by ajayyy on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @11:31AM (#29981570)
It is officially one "team" now https://eyeo.com/teaming-up-for-new-products-the-teams-behin...

Historically, it always seemed like it was one company though as Adblock codebase has been based on Adblock plus codebase for years, and they both use Acceptable ads.

Edit to avoid confusion: Fake "uBlock" (not to be confused with uBlock Origin) is owned by AdBlock https://www.ublock.org/blog/an-update-on-ublock/

Re:Eyeo wins German copyright decision, sets legal precedent... by detaro on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @11:39AM (#29981695)
... and what does that have to do with uBlock? (EDIT: and if you edit in answers to questions into your original comment, please mark that as an edit)
Re:Eyeo wins German copyright decision, sets legal precedent... by erk__ on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @11:41AM (#29981726)
uBlock (Not origin) was acquired by AdBlock (not plus), look under the uBlock header here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UBlock_Origin#uBlock
Re:Eyeo wins German copyright decision, sets legal precedent... by detaro on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @01:35PM (#29983632)
thanks, that was the piece that I was missing
Re:Eyeo wins German copyright decision, sets legal precedent... by efdee on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @11:36AM (#29981647)
That article is about the team(s) behind Adblock and Adblock Plus. It has nothing to do with uBlock Origin.
Re:Eyeo wins German copyright decision, sets legal precedent... by ajayyy on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @11:40AM (#29981714)
Re:Eyeo wins German copyright decision, sets legal precedent... by whimsicalism on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @11:54AM (#29981910)
lol ublock origin blocks that second link
Re:Eyeo wins German copyright decision, sets legal precedent... by xxpor on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @11:36AM (#29981650)
Adblock/ABP != uBlock Origin
Re:Eyeo wins German copyright decision, sets legal precedent... by GuB-42 on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @03:51PM (#29985582)
AdBlock Plus and uBlock are owned by the same company, uBlock is not uBlock Origin, and the history is confusing.

µBlock/uBlock was the original, released in 2014 by Gorhill. In 2015, fed up with support request, he transferred the project to Chris Aljoudi. He then forked his own project, most likely due to a disagreement over donations, it became uBlock Origin. Eventually most people moved from uBlock to the better maintained uBlock Origin. Eyeo eventually bought uBlock and added their "acceptable ads" option.

So you can't say that uBlock is a fake, it is actually the original project. But the one made by the original author is uBlock Origin.

Yes it is confusing, but whatever, get uBlock Origin.

Re:Eyeo wins German copyright decision, sets legal precedent... by gorhill on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @04:44PM (#29986385)
The current "uBlock" is not the original project, "uBlock Origin" is the original project.

The essence of a project is not the location of its repo on GitHub, it's who worked on it since it was first created, i.e. the commit history. If you look at the commit history of "uBlock Origin", it goes back without interruption to June 23rd, 2014, back to when I created the repo.[1]

The claim that the current "uBlock" is the "official", "original" project is a marketing pitch by the people behind it, who I call out as purposefully deceitful.[2]

* * *

[1] https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/graphs/contributors

[2] https://twitter.com/gorhill/status/1477665332156420096