Re:The Silent, Vacinated, Impatient Majority
by DarkWiiPlayer on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @11:54AM
(#29981911)
It's funny how you're finding more and more excuses about how your hate for this one group of people is different from anything else. Because it's always different; that's just how tribalism works.
Re:The Silent, Vacinated, Impatient Majority
by dwaltrip on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @12:50PM
(#29982868)
What’s your point? How do you want people to think about the unvaccinated?
I’m sympathetic to the idea of not hating others, but it seems like you are beating around the bush here a bit.
Re:The Silent, Vacinated, Impatient Majority
by DarkWiiPlayer on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @05:36PM
(#29987092)
> it seems like you are beating around the bush here a bit
What I'm saying is quite simple: Unvaccinated people are being dehumanised all the time. I'm not beating around the bush, I clearly stated this in my first message.
[dead]
Re:The Silent, Vacinated, Impatient Majority
by dang on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @06:43PM
(#30002120)
We've banned this account for repeatedly posting flamewar comments and for using HN (so far at least) as a single-purpose account. Neither of those things are ok here, and definitely not the combo.
Re:The Silent, Vacinated, Impatient Majority
by crispypotatoes on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @01:12PM
(#29983249)
> What’s your point? How do you want people to think about the unvaccinated?
Freedom fighters I think
Re:The Silent, Vacinated, Impatient Majority
by crispypotatoes on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @12:28PM
(#29982513)
> your hate for this one group of people is different from anything else
I don't hate them, I find them stupid and irresponsible
It's interesting that you're pulling the moral outrage card after you've asked about this and found my beliefs consistent
If there's a choice presented to you of "do X thing and don't harm others, or don't and risk harming others" and you pick the 2nd, you're the one in the wrong, plain and simple
Yes, if your religion caused you to harm people by just being near them because it is optional
Again, it's more false equivalency
Some religions require you to not even look at a woman that isn't covered, they need to go and live in an area where that's supported rather than expecting wider society to support that stupid standard