News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:It’s not still the early days of blockchain by gambiting on Saturday January 15, 2022 @07:56AM (#29945972)
But like.....what kind of things can you do without interacting with people when using a blockchain? Name anything. My insurance policy I bought online and I can manage entirely online, change the address, the car, the add-ons, add and remove drivers as well as cars......what exactly is blockchain allowing me to do here that I can't do already?

Same with the bank. I don't think I ever had to speak to my bank in the 8 years I've been with them, or even been to their branch for that matter. You do everything online or in the app.

Re:It’s not still the early days of blockchain by telxosser on Saturday January 15, 2022 @11:49AM (#29947878)
IMO it is because so many people have a kind of sexual fetish of technophilia. They literally get off on new technology. It doesn't matter if it doesn't solve anything. It just needs to feel new and as if progress is being made. As long as it feels new and like progress the technophile will be happy to reinvent the wheel.

Even the word technophile has positive connotations as opposed to something deviant in our society. We don't even have a word for a deviant technophile , deviant over obsession with nonsense and "the next big thing".

Re:It’s not still the early days of blockchain by vasco on Saturday January 15, 2022 @09:16AM (#29946491)
With this attitude, nothing. I've compared it to an unregulated banking API. So for example you can launder money, do transfers that don't go through KYC, among other things.

By now you can also do things that benefit from the network effect of crypto enthusiasts, for example, you can sell JPEGs from a no-name artist for significant amounts of money, which would historically be difficult for outsider-art, regardless of the fact that you're not even selling the actual rights to the images. It also proved to be an interesting way to speculate on internet memes.

There's millions of people using this ecosystem, even if it ends up being overall net negative for the world and a temporary technological distraction, I think one should be able to neutrally assess what it's being used for. You may not like it but it's like saying a nuclear bomb has no use. You may not like what it's being used for, and it may be immoral or illegal, but to say there's no uses when clearly millions are engaging with it and doing "stuff", seems short-sighted for the purposes of discussion.

Re:It’s not still the early days of blockchain by jakupovic on Saturday January 15, 2022 @11:48AM (#29947860)
The last paragraph is what I'm trying to advance in discussions here. You put it much better though.