News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The cameras and lenses used on the latest Oscar nominated... by smm11 on Thursday January 13, 2022 @04:29PM (#29927136)
Meanwhile the world is busy filming with iPhones, and at any second a movie shot with one/them will win an Oscar.
Re:The cameras and lenses used on the latest Oscar nominated... by paxys on Thursday January 13, 2022 @05:21PM (#29927767)
If you mean in any one of the major categories (best Picture, Direction, Cinematography, Sound Editing/Mixing etc.), then it is not going to happen anytime soon, probably ever. There are still several generational gaps between the mainstream equipment in use today and a phone camera.

I can see an iPhone-shot movie getting best documentary short or whatever, but that's it.

Re:The cameras and lenses used on the latest Oscar nominated... by zactato on Thursday January 13, 2022 @04:40PM (#29927258)
I think this might take another generation. The Oscars represent the high production values/costs of the entertainment industry. Giving an Oscar to a 17 year old with an iPhone would threaten the foundation of a lot of that industry.

I suspect we'll see a tipping point soon (if we haven't already) where more minutes of time are spent watching content produced on an iPhone vs an expensive film camera.

Re:The cameras and lenses used on the latest Oscar nominated... by beavertrilogy on Thursday January 13, 2022 @05:10PM (#29927636)
"Tangerine" got pretty close. Made it to Sundance and that was in 2014/2015 with an iPhone 5S. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tangerine_(film)

The threat to the industry definitely appears to be the bigger hurdle, but don't discount workflow. Offloading from an iPhone is non-trivial, especially when all big-budget movies employ at least one DIT (if not an entire team) to manage this process.

Re:The cameras and lenses used on the latest Oscar nominated... by robbrown451 on Thursday January 13, 2022 @10:27PM (#29930264)
Well they gave a Grammy for best engineered album to Finneas (for his sister Billie Eilish's album), and it was recorded and produced on equipment most any of us could afford. Not so different.

I don't see the people who vote for Oscars being so concerned about threatening the foundation of the industry. That would require some sort of corruption or conspiracy, and I'm just not confident that is going on to that level.

Re:The cameras and lenses used on the latest Oscar nominated... by ghaff on Thursday January 13, 2022 @04:55PM (#29927440)
You'll almost certainly see some short documentary or short subject at some point. (i.e. something almost no one ever sees) But other costs so dominate the actual photography, there's little reason to expect a studio to economize on the cinematography (and sound, etc.) other than someone doing it as a stunt.
Re:The cameras and lenses used on the latest Oscar nominated... by lostcolony on Thursday January 13, 2022 @05:09PM (#29927619)
A 17 year old with an iPhone, maybe.

Happily, plenty of industry veterans are finding uses for camera phones. https://momofilmfest.com/oscar-winning-claude-lelouch-cannes...

Re:The cameras and lenses used on the latest Oscar nominated... by TigeriusKirk on Thursday January 13, 2022 @05:39PM (#29927994)
>I suspect we'll see a tipping point soon (if we haven't already) where more minutes of time are spent watching content produced on an iPhone vs an expensive film camera.

Counting Youtube/TikTok/whatever, this must have tipped years ago.

Re:The cameras and lenses used on the latest Oscar nominated... by lostcolony on Thursday January 13, 2022 @05:06PM (#29927574)
Searching for Sugar Man won Best Documentary in 2013 and was partially shot on an iPhone.
Re:The cameras and lenses used on the latest Oscar nominated... by byw on Thursday January 13, 2022 @05:53PM (#29928165)
I suspect at the same time Oscar will gradually become less relevant as people's attentions will be divided between Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes.
Re:The cameras and lenses used on the latest Oscar nominated... by nebula8804 on Friday January 14, 2022 @05:54AM (#29932936)
The viewership has been decreasing for years. I don't think mainstream really pays attention anymore. However it still seems to hold some significant merit among the industry and that counts for something.