posthog seems to be hosted in Digitalocean - an american company

plausible.io is hosted on AWS - an american company

snowplowanalytics.com seems to be hosted in digitalocean as well

as I understand they are equally illegal now.

[Self-hosting and maintaining is not an option for the vast majority of mom-and-pop shops]

Posthog as well as Snowplow are open source solutions that can be self hosted. Snowplow is always hosted in your cloud infrastructure even if you use their managed service.

Fathom's EU docs (https://usefathom.com/features/eu-isolation) seem to suggest that EU-hosted but US-owned cloud infrastructure isn't sufficient either though - you're exposing any data stored/transferred through there to access by the US government.

That means Posthog self-hosted on an AWS server in Frankfurt wouldn't avoid this issue.

What're the best options for non-US owned cloud providers? AFAICT Canada or many other countries with privacy laws would be fine, it's really the US specifically that's problematic.

well according to them they use hetzner and I'm not sure but since hetzner now has us servers they might be in the wrong, too. it has nothing to do with us companies...

When creating a new VM at Hetzner, you have to explicitly pick the US location, for the exact same GDPR reasons. Hetzner has to do this or risk loosing customers because hosting in the US and/or using US services is forbidden for some kind of infrastructures.

let's be honest, no ones want to self hosts a website analytics application because in most of the cases they just want to focus on their core business, or at least that's the value proposition of SaaS. This will ultimately limit innovation to bigger companies that can afford maintaining their own infrastructure for everything.

This is why we went with Fathom as their edge locations are isolated regional (EU). So if I understand it correctly, core hosting is AWS, but on the edge locations run by an EU company in the EU process the data and remove the sensitive data.

For me, it makes no sense when companies like plausible say they have EU based hosting when they pay for hosting from a US-only company (DigitalOcean)

All site data plausible.io stores on behalf of the customers is hosted in Germany on servers owned by Hetzner, a European-owned company. Previously it was hosted by Digital Ocean in Germany but the move to Hetzner was made last year.

All site data plausible.io stores on behalf of the customers is hosted in Germany on servers owned by Hetzner, a European-owned company. Previously it was hosted by Digital Ocean in Germany but the move to Hetzner was made last year.

For our self-hosted version, you can install it with any cloud provider and in any country you wish. Even in the USA.

Uhm, isn't your comment misleading?

https://plausible.io/privacy-focused-web-analytics

All of the data that we do track and collect is kept fully secured, encrypted and hosted on renewable energy powered server in Germany. This ensures that all of the website data is being covered by the European Union’s strict laws on data privacy.

If a US company controls the servers, it’s illegal. If it’s EU-owned, it’s legal.

Plausible seems to use Netlify/AWS for analytics. Both US companies.

Jack, you are free to promote Fathom but I don't think you have the right to spread false information.

In fact, I don't think I will ever use or recommend Fathom to anyone after seeing you act so childish.

I'm confused. Open up Plausible, look for /event in your inspect element (devtools in chrome), look at the IP address that it connects to. Run that IP through ipinfo.io and see which country comes up. If it's the US, it's illegal (as per this entire thread).

What's childish about me not wanting people to potentially get fined?

Yes, I just checked it. It is a testing environment deployed on Cloudflare Workers. What's the problem here exactly? It is the same exact script using the same exact tech behind Plausible.

At what point exactly are they going to get fined? I don't understand so I would love to know, so as long as you actually manage to answer with somewhat of a technical depth.

Maybe you should do one of those "Fathom vs Plausible" pages on your website, then point out that Plausible is using a testing environment and because of that they will be fined.

Sure, happy to explain further. You have found the testing /event but there is another (make sure your ad-blockers are off).

I've put together the details here in an image, so it's easy to follow (https://imgur.com/a/9wEanqD). Hope that explains what I'm talking about.

Sending data from the EU to US-controlled cloud infrastructure is illegal. Please read the noyb article again, read the Schrems II ruling and read the EDPB's advice.

But Plausible doesn't send its data to US-controlled cloud infrastructure? By the looks of it, they're using a self-hosted testing environment through a CDN.

This is unique to Plausible itself and not the services they provide for their customers.

Why do you insinuate misbehavior from a competitive company when you don't have actual proof?

You have the URL of a CDN network that is hosted in the US. What you don't have is the proof of this data being stored in the US. Because it is not. Their FAQ pages clearly state that none of the data is ever stored outside of EU.

Last but not least, you entirely missed my point. Plausible is an extremely successful business, do you really believe they would risk their reputation / livelihood without understanding Schrems II or otherwise?

I honestly have nothing else to say mate. But good luck with Fathom. I am sure it will be a great success.

Yes they do. It's not just about data being stored, it's data processing as a whole. You cannot casually pass EU data subject Personal Data to US-controlled infrastructure.

CDN is processing of Personal Data in the clear. Please read Use Case 6 of the EDPB's recommendations, specifically what they say about US cloud providers (https://edpb.europa.eu/sites/default/files/consultation/edpb...).

And I'm not interested in commenting on what I think Plausible would or wouldn't risk, as it's not relevant.

Well, it's very relevant. Why else would you try and smear a company that is your competitor, yet fights the same fight you're fighting?

And also, you're completely wrong.

As a Plausible customer, your data is never processed in the US, or sent to the "cloud" outside of EU.

Your website visitors Personal Data is processed on US-controlled cloud providers. I've provided evidence that folks reading this need to be careful when choosing analytics software, and I'll leave it at that. I hope to see Plausible move to an EU Isolation approach which doesn't involve US cloud providers.

You have not provided a single ounce of technical proof that Plausible processes their customer data in the US. Furthermore, you have somehow managed to overlook the fact that Plausible does Cookieless tracking without actually tracking any "Personal Data" signals.

I wonder what Paul thinks of your attempts to fear monger people into thinking your crappy product is superior to an open-source alternative.

But hey man, good luck with Fathom. It will be a great success.

I have no skin in this game, but Jack clearly demonstrated that data is passing through servers that our controlled by US-owned entities - namely Cloudflare and Digital Ocean ... what am I missing ?

Just posted this thread to a friend and they said I wasn't being 100% clear, so I apologize. I'll clear things up.

Using EU servers that are owned by a US company (e.g. AWS deployed in the EU, DigitalOcean deployed in the EU) is a violation of the Schrems II ruling. The way you check this is by looking at the IP addresses the analytics software are using, seeing where they're located and who they're owned by. You can then run that IP in ipinfo.io to get information about who controls that IP. If it's a US cloud provider, regardless of server location, it's a GDPR violation.

The English translation of the ruling can be found here. They go into detail within the rulings about the transfer of Personal Data (IP & User Agent) to servers that cannot be protected from US surveillance laws: https://noyb.eu/sites/default/files/2022-01/E-DSB%20-%20Goog...

"This is a very detailed and sound decision. The bottom line is: Companies can't use US cloud services in Europe anymore. It has now been 1.5 years since the Court of Justice confirmed this a second time, so it is more than time that the law is also enforced." - Max Schrems

All site data plausible.io stores on behalf of the customers is hosted in Germany on servers owned by Hetzner, a European-owned company. Previously it was hosted by Digital Ocean in Germany but the move to Hetzner was made last year.

For our self-hosted version, you can install it with any cloud provider and in any country you wish. Even in the USA. That's the testing one we had on our site as we're testing the latest release of our self-hosted version on our own website. This has nothing to do with what our customers place on their sites.

Yup, just to be clear, I wasn’t talking about site data, I was talking about the processing of Personal Data (IP & User Agent).

You were using Netlify previously, which is a US provider and backed by AWS, and then Cloudflare for the testing.

But yesterday I can see you moved to Bunny (an EU cloud provider), which is great news for your customers, party time!

Provided you’re using Hetzner behind Bunny, that looks like solid Schrems II compliance to me.

What I'm hearing from my Govt agency clients is precisely that. EU Datacenters hosted by EU Subsidiaries of American companies are not ok.

Correct. That's absolutely right. I'm not 100% sure how my comment wasn't clear, but I will apologize to everyone if I confused them. Anyway, Plausible updated their analytics to use Bunny yesterday, which is a win for their customers. We wrote more about this solution back in 2021 (https://usefathom.com/blog/eu-isolation) after a lot of work. We spent a lot of time looking into possible options, the law, and are pleased that our innovation is going to help other companies.

You are correct. Fathom Analytics is the only globally distributed provider that offers EU Isolation (keeping EU data completely away from US cloud providers). https://usefathom.com/features/eu-isolation

I don't think the home country of a company matters that much.

International companies must comply to the local laws and regulations. EU is so large market that they will implement anything EU requires. For example, AWS can host and collect EU data and fully comply with EU regulations, never moving data to the US. With AWS customers can determine where their customer data will be stored, including the type of storage and geographic region of that storage.