News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:California tells coronavirus-positive medical workers to ... by lenkite on Thursday January 13, 2022 @12:38AM (#29917233)
Unvaccinated nurses with natural immunity can't stay on the job but infected nurses can. This is peak idiocy.
Re:California tells coronavirus-positive medical workers to ... by muzika on Thursday January 13, 2022 @10:52AM (#29922029)
Wait until those who only had a one booster (and hence are no longer “fully vaccinated”) get fired next year.
Re:California tells coronavirus-positive medical workers to ... by Stevvo on Thursday January 13, 2022 @07:09AM (#29919854)
It's not a real problem because of the millions of nurses nationwide you can count on one hand the number with natural immunity who can't stay on the job because they are unvaccinated.

Also, immunity is not binary. Healthcare professionals by definition work with the most vulnerable and should be getting all the immunity they can get. That's common sense, not peak idiocy.

Re:California tells coronavirus-positive medical workers to ... by dwelch on Thursday January 13, 2022 @08:18AM (#29920416)
I can count on two hands the number of nurses at my one hospital who were fired (or forced to resign, or whatever corporate language you’d like to put on it) last year because they refused to get vaccinated and had recently had COVID within the past few months.
Re:California tells coronavirus-positive medical workers to ... by Terretta on Thursday January 13, 2022 @12:22PM (#29923576)
And you'd need a crowd of hands to count those nurses who were not vaccinated and subsequently died from COVID not with COVID under the care of their former colleagues.

That scenario removed far more caregivers from production than your scenario, so what's your point?

Re:California tells coronavirus-positive medical workers to ... by tinus_hn on Friday January 14, 2022 @05:10AM (#29932633)
In New York there’s more than 30000:

https://www.foxnews.com/us/terminated-health-care-workers-jo...

Yet supposedly in California there’s less than 5. I’m unconvinced.

Re:California tells coronavirus-positive medical workers to ... by skocznymroczny on Thursday January 13, 2022 @06:44AM (#29919637)
If the point is to stop the spread of virus, it is. But if the point is to force everyone to get vaccinated (why?), it is not.
Re:California tells coronavirus-positive medical workers to ... by Ekaros on Thursday January 13, 2022 @06:47AM (#29919665)
Which is why from medical and ethical standpoint the vaccine passports that are oh so popular never made any sense. Vaccinated people can and do spread it. Even among each other. So what is the point? For proper control the test passport would have been the clear solution.

But I take there are political opinions behind this...

Re:California tells coronavirus-positive medical workers to ... by pipodeclown on Thursday January 13, 2022 @07:18AM (#29919933)
The point is that vaccinated people have lower infection rates and if they do catch, they spread it less. That is the justification for having less restrictions on vaccinated people.
Re:California tells coronavirus-positive medical workers to ... by Ekaros on Thursday January 13, 2022 @07:22AM (#29919977)
Still non-zero infection rates. Also it is clear that they have lead to increase spreading as people take less precautions and do more risky behaviour like drugs...
Re:California tells coronavirus-positive medical workers to ... by Terretta on Thursday January 13, 2022 @12:23PM (#29923599)
Non zero people die with seatbelts too.

Remember when we were told seatbelts would make people drive like lunatics so we shouldn't legally require them? (I do.)