News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:NASA says Webb’s excess fuel likely to extend its lifetim... by dredmorbius on Tuesday January 11, 2022 @11:54AM (#29894049)
I find it interesting that planning overruns such as this seem to get pinned on implementation, rather than the planning and approval processes themselves.

The evidence is that the time and cost it took to produce JWST are what they are. That planners lowballed these estimates, or that administrators and legislators wouldn't have approved greenlighting based on accurate estimates, speak to failures in planning and administration, rather than engineering.

Much of the planning / large-project literature, which I've studied for some three decades, seems itself to be largely blind to this distinction.

As to many comments found on the Internet mirroring such viewpoints.

Re:NASA says Webb’s excess fuel likely to extend its lifetim... by thehappypm on Tuesday January 11, 2022 @12:29PM (#29894567)
Maybe it’s by design. A 5 year project can be greenlit by Congress, and delays forgiven.

20 year project? Dies in committee.

Re:NASA says Webb’s excess fuel likely to extend its lifetim... by dredmorbius on Tuesday January 11, 2022 @01:11PM (#29895274)
Nothing to show the folks back home, risk of being either primaried or challenged by the other party.

Welcome to politics.