Re:Intel removes Xinjiang references from shareholder letter
by tlear on Tuesday January 11, 2022 @11:08AM
(#29893229)
Silica is not an issue. Intel executives getting kidnapped(err arrested for illegal blah blah), local managers disappearing, sudden "corruption" investigations etc.
There are 2 choices, clear out everything and everyone associated with Intel out of PRC or comply.
Re:Intel removes Xinjiang references from shareholder letter
by radmuzom on Tuesday January 11, 2022 @12:09PM
(#29894245)
Funny how China doing something are always in the future tense. Whereas the ones who have committed the atrocity of actually illegally detaining an executive by putting pressure on a friendly country is the USA.
Re:Intel removes Xinjiang references from shareholder letter
by swagasaurus-rex on Tuesday January 11, 2022 @12:20PM
(#29894421)
Weren't Canadian tourists arrested with bogus charges in response?
Re:Intel removes Xinjiang references from shareholder letter
by radmuzom on Tuesday January 11, 2022 @12:25PM
(#29894499)
So? A criminal country with the worst instances of human rights violations and violation of international law all across the world illegally detains the CFO of a company because of their country; and you expect that her country is not going to take action on that?
Re:Intel removes Xinjiang references from shareholder letter
by mlindner on Tuesday January 11, 2022 @12:41PM
(#29894770)
It wasn't an illegal detainment. The company was working with Iran. Oh and she lived in a mansion in Vancouver throughout the whole thing. I'm sure she had endured much hardship getting a free vacation for a couple years.
Re:Intel removes Xinjiang references from shareholder letter
by AnimalMuppet on Tuesday January 11, 2022 @12:14PM
(#29894322)
Illegally detaining an executive is not an "atrocity". Violation of international norms, perhaps, but not an atrocity. Atrocity takes a lot higher standard than that.
Re:Intel removes Xinjiang references from shareholder letter
by Paradigma11 on Tuesday January 11, 2022 @02:53PM
(#29896870)
Illegal by violating what laws?
Re:Intel removes Xinjiang references from shareholder letter
by thatfunkymunki on Tuesday January 11, 2022 @04:46PM
(#29898485)
ah yes, equating the detention of a rich person in a mansion with an industrial scale genocide operation.
Xinjiang has some silica mines [0] which may go into silicon production. Presumably, that is a critical material for Intel. Can it be sourced elsewhere? Is that the leverage the CCP has over Intel?
[0] https://www.scmp.com/economy/china-economy/article/3139062/u...