News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Matrix Resurrections estimated to lose Warner Bros $100M by oliyoung on Monday January 10, 2022 @08:54PM (#29886184)
> I honestly cannot tell if Lana Wachowski hates the Matrix or not.

The movies and the production of them? Yes.

The concept and story? No.

> Did she honestly ruin it on purpose?

Yes. I think she did.

Re:The Matrix Resurrections estimated to lose Warner Bros $100M by wyldfire on Monday January 10, 2022 @10:15PM (#29886978)
I loved "Alien." Just an awesome film. Over the years there have been several sequels and spinoffs. Probably more bad than good. But there's definitely been some good ones. I just spend less time thinking about the bad ones.
Re:The Matrix Resurrections estimated to lose Warner Bros $100M by CodeGlitch on Tuesday January 11, 2022 @03:05AM (#29888839)
Apart from the first Matrix movie, which is amazing, have the Wachowskis actually made any other good movies? Was it just the case that they were surrounded by talented people in the first movie and listened to them? Then after it was successful they were like "we got this".
Re:The Matrix Resurrections estimated to lose Warner Bros $100M by dereg on Tuesday January 11, 2022 @03:41AM (#29889049)
Bound? Cloud Atlas? Speed Racer? Reloaded, as a pure action flick?

One thing I admire about the Wachowskis is their insane ambition. You either hate it or love it but let's not pretend like they were just lucky.

Re:The Matrix Resurrections estimated to lose Warner Bros $100M by superiorflush on Tuesday January 11, 2022 @08:55AM (#29891465)
Cloud Atlas was a mess.
Re:The Matrix Resurrections estimated to lose Warner Bros $100M by dasKrokodil on Tuesday January 11, 2022 @11:50AM (#29893971)
They wrote the screenplay for 'V for Vendetta', which I thought was a pretty good movie.
Re:The Matrix Resurrections estimated to lose Warner Bros $100M by SV_BubbleTime on Monday January 10, 2022 @09:26PM (#29886515)
What kind of person would take something of their own and ruin it like that?

Tons of people loved the matrix, just let it be.

Re:The Matrix Resurrections estimated to lose Warner Bros $100M by oliyoung on Monday January 10, 2022 @09:35PM (#29886601)
Plenty of people. Part of the act of creation can be it's destruction https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2021/oct/14/banksy-...
Re:The Matrix Resurrections estimated to lose Warner Bros $100M by Apocryphon on Monday January 10, 2022 @09:45PM (#29886706)
I really don't like this new movie, but it doesn't impact my enjoyment of the ones that came before. If I really cared to, I can just pretend that this movie doesn't exist, as people are fond of doing to the original two sequels.

Even from a "cinematic universe" or "canon" perspective I don't recognize its ability to affect the previous story; we're living in a rapidly accelerating era of media where escapism commands huge money and nostalgia is king; who's to say five or ten years down the line someone else might not make a new Matrix property and retcon the story as told in this one? Would be funny if Lilly Wachowski was the one to do that.

Re:The Matrix Resurrections estimated to lose Warner Bros $100M by brightball on Monday January 10, 2022 @10:21PM (#29887032)
Exactly. There are only 3 Indiana Jones movies.
Re:The Matrix Resurrections estimated to lose Warner Bros $100M by philistine on Monday January 10, 2022 @11:56PM (#29887747)
THERE ARE FOUR LIGHTS!
Re:The Matrix Resurrections estimated to lose Warner Bros $100M by abathur on Monday January 10, 2022 @09:45PM (#29886698)
Assuming the dialog can be believed: they either had to participate in the reboot, or let WB reboot it without them.
Re:The Matrix Resurrections estimated to lose Warner Bros $100M by SV_BubbleTime on Tuesday January 11, 2022 @12:28PM (#29894543)
Ok, makes sense. Instead of WB making a horrible movie, Wachowski did it for them?

I’m not sure the Wachowski brand has improved after this.

Re:The Matrix Resurrections estimated to lose Warner Bros $100M by minimaxir on Monday January 10, 2022 @10:03PM (#29886853)
It was rumored that WB would have made another Matrix without Wachowski involvement if she had not agreed to it. Who knows how that would have turned out.
Re:The Matrix Resurrections estimated to lose Warner Bros $100M by SV_BubbleTime on Monday January 10, 2022 @10:20PM (#29887027)
Sure ok, but so what?

What kind of person (allegedly) sinks a movie franchise out of spite?

How about… Not do that and put effort into everything you do?

IDK. Not sure I buy this and think it’s possible the Wachowskis that made the first movies are gone, and this was a good effort. ♬don’t let money change ya♬.

Re:The Matrix Resurrections estimated to lose Warner Bros $100M by oliyoung on Monday January 10, 2022 @11:03PM (#29887373)
> sinks a movie franchise out of spite?

it's not spite. She didn't "sink" it because she was spiteful, she wanted to say something about the films and her work and chose to deconstruct the act of making a sequel to a trilogy after 20 years. It's their art, they can do what they want with it.

Their work since Matrix has always been avant-guard (Cloud Atlas is barely a film in any normal sense, a Speed Racer film by anyone else isn't _that_) they were never coming back to make another stock science-fiction action film.

The real question is, how did Warner green-light the script and release knowing that it was going say all those things.

Re:The Matrix Resurrections estimated to lose Warner Bros $100M by titzer on Monday January 10, 2022 @11:24PM (#29887520)
It was really petty and I lost a lot of respect for her over this. She could have let WB fail on their own (proving what a masterstroke their first movie was), she could have outdone it (proving she's still a master), or she could have given a middling effort. All of which, IMHO, would have been better than intentionally sullying--frankly, ruining--the original piece.

Frankly I hope I can just forget the fourth movie, because I don't want to watch the first movie knowing that Neo ends up a doddering old pilled-up nutter and Trinity's a cookie cutter soccer mom with barely a bike shop. (and of course, that's silly, because they didn't really end up that way, they were put into that way--at great expense--for why again? stupid plot. Stupid, stupid plot.)

Re:The Matrix Resurrections estimated to lose Warner Bros $100M by minimaxir on Tuesday January 11, 2022 @12:08AM (#29887826)
> The real question is, how did Warner green-light the script and release knowing that it was going say all those things.

Self depreciation is fine for WB. Half the jokes in the new Space Jam are meta self-depreciation. (not funny jokes, but jokes nonetheless)

Re:The Matrix Resurrections estimated to lose Warner Bros $100M by shmoopi on Tuesday January 11, 2022 @12:54AM (#29888086)
The new Space Jam is hands down the worst picture I've ever seen.
Re:The Matrix Resurrections estimated to lose Warner Bros $100M by vegai_ on Tuesday January 11, 2022 @03:59AM (#29889155)
>What kind of person (allegedly) sinks a movie franchise out of spite?

Is it spite to not want your baby to become another Marvel/Star Wars clusterjerk? Perhaps it is, but I think she's allowed that. I don't think the world needs more of those, but it will always need more art and critique.

Re:The Matrix Resurrections estimated to lose Warner Bros $100M by nsonha on Tuesday January 11, 2022 @01:12AM (#29888180)
Better than this one? It's a pretty low bar.