Re:Intel claims new i9 is faster than M1 Max
by deepnotderp on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @08:07PM
(#29803502)
To all the commenters: This is claimed on a power adjusted basis: https://mobile.twitter.com/witeken/status/147844103741682893...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Intel claims new i9 is faster than M1 Max
by ksec on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @09:03PM
(#29804006)
1. This is a slide from Intel. And they dont mention what sort of performance. Edit [1]
2. This is from witeken. A Well known Intel "supporter".
AlderLake is good, but claiming it offer more Pref / Watt than Apple's M1 Max on a node that is generation behind would require some independent testing to verify . Because all the data known so far doesn't seems to suggest this. Especially in the case of Single Core Performance.
[1] The metric used is the geometric mean of an "n-copy" SPECrate run of the C/C++ integer benchmarks in SPEC CPU 2017. You can find the M1 SPECrate 2017 results here
https://www.anandtech.com/show/16252/mac-mini-apple-m1-teste...
Re:Intel claims new i9 is faster than M1 Max
by deepnotderp on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @11:21PM
(#29805096)
To be fair, comparing TSMC’s nodes vs Intel’s isn’t exactly fair for CPUs since Intel has always had performance advantages beyond density such as Ion, cobalt, air gaps, etc.
Edit: Ion= on state current
Re:Intel claims new i9 is faster than M1 Max
by fouc on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @08:33PM
(#29803763)
If I'm reading this right, it's saying that when M1 Max is at peak performance (at 35W), the I9-12900HK is beating this performance while at the same wattage.
I'm a bit skeptical this is true
Re:Intel claims new i9 is faster than M1 Max
by RototRobot on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @08:34PM
(#29803767)
It really wouldn't make any sense if it weren't? as by raw power the previous gen was already more powerful right?