News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Archaeological dig reignites debate over the Old Testament’s historical accuracy. Parent comment

Re:Archaeological dig reignites debate over the Old Testamen... by dang on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @06:29PM (#29802497)
We've switched from "Is the Old Testament historically accurate?" (which was the HTML doc title, not something the submitter made up, but still too baity) to the page title, which seems more factual and neutral.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Archaeological dig reignites debate over the Old Testamen... by rbanffy on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @07:38PM (#29803199)
I would never imagine the Smithsonian would do a click-bait like this.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Archaeological dig reignites debate over the Old Testamen... by dang on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @09:24PM (#29804202)
The pressures, alas, are merciless on everybody, and it seems like they all cave eventually. Even august science journals are doing it increasingly.

We get to take a different approach here because the economics are different, which is sort of a miracle if you think about it.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Archaeological dig reignites debate over the Old Testamen... by geoduck14 on Wednesday January 05, 2022 @12:52AM (#29805641)
>which is sort of a miracle if you think about it.

Yeah, but does the miracle reaffirm the old testament?

Jk. Keep up the good work, Dang

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Archaeological dig reignites debate over the Old Testamen... by ARandomerDude on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @08:49PM (#29803903)
Their online history publishing group is very clickbaity in my experience.
[ Parent | on HN ]