Re:Design evolution of the Windows control panel
by gjvc on Thursday December 16, 2021 @09:31PM
(#29586991)
Windows 2000 was clearly the peak in this article, and (as a whole system) it did feel like it at the time. (I do wish it had included ClearType though...)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Design evolution of the Windows control panel
by canadaduane on Thursday December 16, 2021 @10:08PM
(#29587212)
After Windows XP I always felt like they were hiding the actual control panel from me, and I no longer felt in control.
Re:Design evolution of the Windows control panel
by Sindisil on Friday December 17, 2021 @08:31AM
(#29591823)
They were (and are) and, to an increasing degree, you are not.
Re:Design evolution of the Windows control panel
by userbinator on Friday December 17, 2021 @01:57AM
(#29588828)
I think all the icons looked great, with minor changes, until Win10's new "Settings" --- in which it looks like they just decided to throw away decades of careful design and replace them with dumbed-down flat and bland ones. All the more infuriating that new Settings is noticeably less responsive and at the same time less functional.
Re:Design evolution of the Windows control panel
by einpoklum on Friday December 17, 2021 @02:29AM
(#29589023)
Such visual style change has happened in quite a few applications, perhaps inspired by the same kind of 'wisdom'. Thunderbird is a prominent example.
Re:Design evolution of the Windows control panel
by gjvc on Friday December 17, 2021 @05:19AM
(#29590225)
Seems like the beginnings of the "flat" trend was of Jonathan Ive's making -- once Steve Jobs and Scott Forstall had gone, there was nobody who would prevent it.
Re:Design evolution of the Windows control panel
by RcouF1uZ4gsC on Thursday December 16, 2021 @11:02PM
(#29587569)
Same here. One thing I also felt about Windows 2000 is that it was designed for professionals. Windows XP, in my mind, made compromises to appeal to a wider swath of consumers.
Re:Design evolution of the Windows control panel
by pkrumins on Friday December 17, 2021 @01:00AM
(#29588437)
Totally agree (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28346076). Computing is coming to an end with these new dumb interfaces.
Re:Design evolution of the Windows control panel
by gjvc on Friday December 17, 2021 @08:38AM
(#29591892)
On that thread torgoguys says "I see 2000s UI as being from a time when (for the most part) they weren't trying to impress you with the gloss on the UI. They were just trying to make it clear and usable. More modern iterations of Windows has some advancements in interactions but not much in the GUI controls themselves." which is such a good observation, I think it bears repeating here. (emphasis added by me)
Re:Design evolution of the Windows control panel
by gjvc on Friday December 24, 2021 @09:16AM
(#29673745)
(wish #2) ...and that it had been available in a 64-bit version.
Re:Design evolution of the Windows control panel
by kumarvvr on Thursday December 16, 2021 @10:10PM
(#29587225)
For me, it was Windows 7.
Re:Design evolution of the Windows control panel
by throaway46546 on Thursday December 16, 2021 @10:13PM
(#29587238)
For me, it's the McChicken.
Re:Design evolution of the Windows control panel
by voidfunc on Thursday December 16, 2021 @11:10PM
(#29587628)
While I agree, Id also argue virtually every posters opinion on HN about design of the Windows CP is useless. Most of us are power users and it we are not power users we are incredibly opinionated about some UX stuff.
Re:Design evolution of the Windows control panel
by Aeolun on Friday December 17, 2021 @04:34AM
(#29589895)
I like PC’s for power users. If we dumb down the PC, the people using it get dumber too.
But I don’t know. 7 year old me could figure out the classic control panel. I don’t think it was that hard.
Re:Design evolution of the Windows control panel
by sdfdf4434r34r on Friday December 17, 2021 @11:34AM
(#29594472)
'Normies' probably never open up the control panel/settings to change anything, ever.
Re:Design evolution of the Windows control panel
by gjvc on Thursday December 16, 2021 @11:17PM
(#29587677)
please exclude me from your generalisations