News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Max Headroom Incident by flatiron on Tuesday November 23, 2021 @04:33PM (#29323850)
i believe there were cuts in the video so it was prerecorded. cuts that apparently were so clean it was another piece of evidence they had some access to some professional equipment as consumer grade equipment of the time wasn't up to the task
Re:The Max Headroom Incident by h2odragon on Tuesday November 23, 2021 @04:59PM (#29324096)
It could have been put together in one of several schools in the area from consumer grade sources.
Re:The Max Headroom Incident by laurent92 on Tuesday November 23, 2021 @05:29PM (#29324370)
At that time, printers already printed yellow dots with the serial ID. I’m most surprised VHS wasn’t watermarked. It could have helped a lot in terrorist investigations (ransom videos).

I’m always afraid when I hear someone copypasting Apple memos. Obviously they must have watermark, if not text glyphs (rn = m, and further UTF-8 incantations), at least subtly different phrasing depending on which department, or person, views it.

Re:The Max Headroom Incident by GekkePrutser on Tuesday November 23, 2021 @08:25PM (#29325950)
VHS was pretty mediocre. Any watermarking inside the signal would have been noticeable or destroyed in transmission.

However it's true that the top invisible scanlines normally used for Teletext could have been used for this. My VCR did record them, I was surprised to be able to view Teletext pages at the time of recording, though they were full of distortion.

It would have been possible to filter that out though.

I think at the time VHS recorders were still mostly analog and would have been recognisable from their artifacts the same way a typewriter can be identified once found.

Re:The Max Headroom Incident by LordDragonfang on Tuesday November 23, 2021 @11:43PM (#29326993)
A VCR isn't like most other forms of visual recording media where it takes an image and records it in some other format to be converted back to an image later, it's actually a 1-to-1 analogue recording of the broadcast signal (minus any degradation from being an analogue copy). So by design it includes any tricks they used to include metadata in the normal broadcast signal.

The mechanics of how they worked are actually pretty interesting, I highly recommend Technology Connections' video on the subject [1], as well as the one on closed-captioning [2] (and his series on analogue TV in general [3])

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfuARMCyTvg

[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SL6zs2bDks

[3] https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLv0jwu7G_DFUGEfwEl0uW...

Re:The Max Headroom Incident by Trixter on Wednesday November 24, 2021 @04:23PM (#29335329)
> At that time, printers already printed yellow dots with the serial ID.

No schools in 1987 had color laser printers with this technology (and I doubt many businesses did either). Any students trying to do something fishy would have had to make do with, at best, 24-pin dot matrix printers with color ribbons.

Re:The Max Headroom Incident by dymk on Tuesday November 23, 2021 @05:57PM (#29324623)
Facebook has caught leakers in the past, by modifying the whitespace in internal memos shown to employees
Re:The Max Headroom Incident by sillysaurusx on Tuesday November 23, 2021 @06:11PM (#29324737)
Hmm. "Command-A shift-J in macvim if you ever need to leak a memo" is now a piece of advice. How strange.
Re:The Max Headroom Incident by jack_pp on Wednesday November 24, 2021 @12:52AM (#29327275)
If you really want to be safe translate to another language then translate back
Re:The Max Headroom Incident by PostThisTooFast on Tuesday November 23, 2021 @09:38PM (#29326403)
That's not true. Numerous home video recorders by that time had flying erase heads that could make clean cuts.