News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Uber, DoorDash and similar firms can’t defy the laws of c... by batshit_beaver on Wednesday November 10, 2021 @12:04PM (#29177084)
If pervious economies were so well functioning, why couldn't I easily order pretty much any food from any restaurant within a 50 mile radius with a click of a button before Uber and DoorDash came along?
Re:Uber, DoorDash and similar firms can’t defy the laws of c... by ska on Wednesday November 10, 2021 @12:21PM (#29177319)
> If pervious economies were so well functioning

An efficient economy doesn't mean you can do anything you can imagine is technically possible; it means that market rates with everything priced in properly will discover whether or not enough people value it enough to pay for it.

Re:Uber, DoorDash and similar firms can’t defy the laws of c... by onemoresoop on Wednesday November 10, 2021 @12:22PM (#29177327)
50 miles radius? I bet you weren't only not tipping the delivery guy but also complained your food was cold.

Local economies were functioning well before for years, you were getting food from around your area, which is perfectly acceptable and efficient.

Re:Uber, DoorDash and similar firms can’t defy the laws of c... by tempest_ on Wednesday November 10, 2021 @12:08PM (#29177152)
There existed many companies/people who would collect whatever you wanted and bring it where ever for a fee with a phone call.

People would not be willing to pay the price however.

Re:Uber, DoorDash and similar firms can’t defy the laws of c... by JulianMorrison on Wednesday November 10, 2021 @02:47PM (#29179616)
Two things can be simultaneously true

- delivery was under-served and over-priced, and taxis charged too much, often because of viciously expensive auctions for limited legal taxicab slots, with the city raking it in and the drivers having to recoup it from fares

- Uber and friends are exploitative dumping schemes that tighten the screws on their gig workers even while they firehose money at customers

Re:Uber, DoorDash and similar firms can’t defy the laws of c... by Marazan on Wednesday November 10, 2021 @12:38PM (#29177535)
Concierge services have always existed.

You weren't willing to pay the unsubsidised price.

Re:Uber, DoorDash and similar firms can’t defy the laws of c... by compiler-guy on Wednesday November 10, 2021 @12:35PM (#29177496)
Because those economies functioned in a relatively closed system of finance, and the actual cost of delivery was covered within that system. The actual cost of delivery is reflected in the price of getting the delivery. Or, if no delivery was easily available, it was because the cost of keeping such a system up, running, and easily available was higher than could be managed profitably.

Doordash works today because venture capitalists are throwing millions of dollars at it, and dramatically subsidizing the cost of the delivery.

In other words, you can do that today because someone else is willing to pay. The VC's money won't last forever though. The question is if the economies of scale it creates will be enough to reduce the cost of delivery such that it is a sustainable business.

Most available data says "Probably not."

Re:Uber, DoorDash and similar firms can’t defy the laws of c... by SonicScrub on Wednesday November 10, 2021 @01:16PM (#29178146)
You absolutely could do that before. The average person just couldn't afford the prices until it became heavily subsidized by VC money.
Re:Uber, DoorDash and similar firms can’t defy the laws of c... by tw04 on Wednesday November 10, 2021 @12:41PM (#29177589)
Because most people weren’t willing to pay more for the delivery than their meal, so nobody bothered.
Re:Uber, DoorDash and similar firms can’t defy the laws of c... by maedla on Wednesday November 10, 2021 @12:06PM (#29177114)
One could always just call