Re:Nuclear power is the best climate-change solution
by stavros on Saturday November 06, 2021 @04:45AM
(#29128482)
> Far sooner than I'd expect to see solar have a similar impact.
Sure, and there's no reason we can't have both, that's my point.
> A dirty bomb could be an environmental disaster.
I live in an area with ~20 coal plants in a 15-minute radius and, let me tell you, a dirty bomb would probably have been cleaner.
Re:Nuclear power is the best climate-change solution
by thedrbrian on Saturday November 06, 2021 @06:16AM
(#29128999)
Ok I’m curious. What sort of industrial area needs 20 coal power plants in a 15 minute ?drive?
Major aluminium production and mining , chinese crypto hub ?
Re:Nuclear power is the best climate-change solution
by stavros on Saturday November 06, 2021 @07:50AM
(#29129418)
No, nothing like that. There are just large coal reserves and this area powers much of Greece's electricity.
The main problem with nuclear is the dangers of letting them get into a state of disrepair. In a politically unstable county it could be a real danger if they cannot secure the fuel or waste. A dirty bomb could be an environmental disaster.
Here in NZ many install solar and back feed the grid. They get paid to do so. But this doesn't help reduce emissions. During peak load the coal plants still fire up. We have significant hydro generation but require fossil fuels to deal with peak load. If home owners invested in batteries alone I suspect we could do a better job reducing our emissions.