Re:NYT journalist hacked with Pegasus after reporting on pre...
by fabianhjr on Sunday October 24, 2021 @10:01PM
(#28983781)
I just go solid opaque bar. Way easier to do and harder to screw up.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:NYT journalist hacked with Pegasus after reporting on pre...
by johnfn on Sunday October 24, 2021 @10:58PM
(#28984083)
Amusingly enough, people have even screwed this up. I recall some government agency trying to censor data with a black bar, but the problem was that the data was in a SVG-like document, so people could just delete the bars from the document and see the apparently-censored text.
Re:NYT journalist hacked with Pegasus after reporting on pre...
by mjevans on Monday October 25, 2021 @02:46AM
(#28985061)
I built a redaction process for a small company once.
My critical security step was rendering out the PDF as individual flat image files, then re-assembling it like a traditionally photo-copied document.
That way the loss-full operation is enforced, at the cost of forcing end users to OCR unsearchable image-scan (like) PDFs.
Re:NYT journalist hacked with Pegasus after reporting on pre...
by hyper_dynamics on Monday October 25, 2021 @05:36AM
(#28985954)
It's the only way to be sure!
Re:NYT journalist hacked with Pegasus after reporting on pre...
by raxxorrax on Monday October 25, 2021 @08:15AM
(#28986910)
You could replace the censored text with gibberish before blacking it out. Or some secret message for QAnons to find.
Re:NYT journalist hacked with Pegasus after reporting on pre...
by pvillano on Monday October 25, 2021 @07:20PM
(#28994444)
well if you had an open (.odf) or openable (.doc≈xml) format you could replace strings and be sure something was gone
Re:NYT journalist hacked with Pegasus after reporting on pre...
by eeegnu on Monday October 25, 2021 @01:05AM
(#28984629)
It would be funny to place fake data behind the removable bars for tech savvy people to find.
Re:NYT journalist hacked with Pegasus after reporting on pre...
by geoduck14 on Monday October 25, 2021 @11:33AM
(#28988980)
>
It would be funny to place fake data behind the removable bars for tech savvy people to find.
Tech savvy people, but also journalists
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2021/10/missouri-gov-cal...
Re:NYT journalist hacked with Pegasus after reporting on pre...
by tait on Sunday October 24, 2021 @11:40PM
(#28984286)
I remember a version of this happening with PDFs
Re:NYT journalist hacked with Pegasus after reporting on pre...
by lelandfe on Monday October 25, 2021 @04:30AM
(#28985657)
Yep - Apple wound up adding a “Redact” tool to Preview.app for PDFs, likely in response to all the people who just drew shapes over selectable sensitive text.
https://eclecticlight.co/2020/12/11/how-effective-and-safe-i...
Re:NYT journalist hacked with Pegasus after reporting on pre...
by franga2000 on Monday October 25, 2021 @02:05AM
(#28984879)
The EU has redacted PDFs this way a number of times, but I don't think anything truly sensitive ever leaked.
Re:NYT journalist hacked with Pegasus after reporting on pre...
by ghostly_s on Monday October 25, 2021 @01:08AM
(#28984642)
This has happened with PDFs many, many times.
Re:NYT journalist hacked with Pegasus after reporting on pre...
by rincebrain on Monday October 25, 2021 @12:32AM
(#28984524)
I believe the US government did this at least once, by implementing the black bars in a PDF as a separate object, so the unredacted item was intact in the files they shared.
Whoops.
Re:NYT journalist hacked with Pegasus after reporting on pre...
by bayindirh on Monday October 25, 2021 @02:26AM
(#28984965)
I remember that.
Unredacted versions were also circulated.
Re:NYT journalist hacked with Pegasus after reporting on pre...
by stronglikedan on Monday October 25, 2021 @10:08AM
(#28987975)
> just delete the bars
I think you mean "illegally hack the black bars".
Re:NYT journalist hacked with Pegasus after reporting on pre...
by tablespoon on Monday October 25, 2021 @09:23PM
(#28995320)
> I just go solid opaque bar. Way easier to do and harder to screw up.
There may be graphic design reasons you don't want to do that. A big black redaction bar isn't much of an illustration.