News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google digital advertising antitrust litigation [pdf] by windexh8er on Sunday October 24, 2021 @09:08AM (#28977544)
Bullshit meter?

It seems to me this is yet another validation that Google is an ad sales company hell bent on preventing competition, controlling the market and lying to end users and integrators. All of these pieces are adding up - what was conjecture is finally being validated and I, personally, believe that Google is not in it for the good of the customer, but are only in it for a profit. Death to Google by thousands of cuts like this? Game on.

I've said it before, sales organizations only base performance on profit. It is the toxin that defines all of this misbehaviour. Nobody "thinks" they're doing anything wrong because it's talked about as benefiting the shareholder. Google isn't immune to this.

Re:Google digital advertising antitrust litigation [pdf] by magicalist on Sunday October 24, 2021 @09:25AM (#28977673)
> It seems to me this is yet another validation

That's just what I mean. There's a tiny amount of validation and a lot of rhetoric. It would be preferable to be able to see the actual sources they're quoting from.

[dead]
Re:Google digital advertising antitrust litigation [pdf] by dang on Sunday October 24, 2021 @01:11PM (#28979861)
You can't attack others like this here. We ban accounts that post flamewar comments, such as this one and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28733439. If you'd please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and stick to the rules when posting here, we'd appreciate it.

I appreciate and share your desire to protect the integrity of the site but we need to do it in a way that doesn't do even more damage.

Re:Google digital advertising antitrust litigation [pdf] by kylevedder on Sunday October 24, 2021 @10:31AM (#28978246)
That's a pretty bad faith reply. I'm not paid by Google to astroturf (feel free to look at my account) and I agree with magicalist: I want to see primary sources before drawing any significant conclusions.
Re:Google digital advertising antitrust litigation [pdf] by magicalist on Sunday October 24, 2021 @10:44AM (#28978382)
Nope, but also please don't try to shut down conversation this way.
Re:Google digital advertising antitrust litigation [pdf] by windexh8er on Sunday October 24, 2021 @04:01PM (#28981368)
Just because the floodgates haven't opened with all of the insight you may want doesn't mean it's not valid - re: "bullshit meter".

Google has an army of the best in legal and part of their play is limiting this information from ever being seen. I'm curious, what would be enough validation to pass your sniff test? And are you saying you think this is being overblown?

Re:Google digital advertising antitrust litigation [pdf] by magicalist on Sunday October 24, 2021 @08:21PM (#28983244)
> I'm curious, what would be enough validation to pass your sniff test?

From my first post:

> but this would be a lot more convincing with the source emails entered into the record

:)

Re:Google digital advertising antitrust litigation [pdf] by thereddaikon on Monday October 25, 2021 @04:14PM (#28992567)
That's what discovery is for. You don't usually see evidence like that in the initial filings.
Re:Google digital advertising antitrust litigation [pdf] by hoffs on Sunday October 24, 2021 @01:22PM (#28979999)
Validation? What else you want validated as I can whip up a doc with some claims about things without source/proof too.