GitHub degraded performance – resolved

Re:GitHub degraded performance – resolved by eyegor on Thursday October 21, 2021 @01:37PM (#28948050)

I'd recommend checking out gitlab for on-prem hosting in an enterprise environment. Works great, integrates with AD/ldap and most of the features are available on the free tier if you want to test it. Practically a drop in replacement for github.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GitHub degraded performance – resolved by mdaniel on Thursday October 21, 2021 @06:16PM (#28951497)

I love GitLab, and am now a shareholder, but advertising it as "drop in replacement" is setting up an evaluator for disappointment

At the very least, they use just absolutely incompatible yaml files for their CI pipelines (in, of course, an incompatible location in the repo)

But probably the bigger obstacle would be their incompatible API (and incompatible auth to it); that means one cannot grab a cool "github bot/tool for doing $X" and expect it to do anything reasonable in GitLab

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GitHub degraded performance – resolved by wdb on Thursday October 21, 2021 @10:20PM (#28953077)

I wish Gitlab had a form of the Checkruns API and allow you to annotate lines in source files, e.g. your linting errors or that vulnerability integration wasn't only available in Ultimate

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GitHub degraded performance – resolved by mdaniel on Friday October 22, 2021 @01:56AM (#28954088)

I used ReviewDog to wire in Qodana results, so I hear you about wishing it was built in, but it is achievable: https://github.com/reviewdog/reviewdog#reporter-gitlab-merge...

Based on my contact with GitLab's built-in other scanning tools, I wouldn't trust their vuln management further than I could throw it, so you're likely not missing much on that front

[ Parent | on HN ]