I hate it to say it, but for CS beginners python.org isn't a good resource: it's simply too technical. Even for motivated students it will take them at least a few months of learning from a more beginner-friendly resource before the official docs on python.org make sense.

That's not to mention the multitude of other materials on python.org other than the docs, like PEPs, pypi (third party libraries), bug reports, etc. Can you imagine a student searching for how to use a Python feature, but found a PEP illustrating the design of that language feature?

> Can you imagine a student searching for how to use a Python feature, but found a PEP illustrating the design of that language feature?

That wouldn‘t be so bad. PEPs contain a short summary, motivation, and usage examples.

That said, I do get your point.

What about people who keep snakes as pets?

Their queries (such as "best food for reticulated python") are unlikely to have results from "python.org", so such rules would not affect them.

There's room for ambiguity. python egg, python length, python container, python types, python size, python lifespan

"For security, it is best to manage Python within its own dedicated container. Live Python in an unmanaged environment is unwise and can lead to resource strangulation. When objects are consumed by Python, this will affect their lifespan."

I think you’re broadly talking about site authority which is something search engines absolutely do, I imagine it’s a non trivial thing to get right and the scope of doing it manually for every topic on the planet is probably not going to be easy.