Re:Wg-access-server: An all-in-one WireGuard VPN solution wi...
by probotect0r on Friday October 01, 2021 @03:38PM
(#28722549)
Has anyone used this for internal company VPN for accessing resources on something like AWS VPC?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Wg-access-server: An all-in-one WireGuard VPN solution wi...
by arcticfox on Friday October 01, 2021 @03:51PM
(#28722665)
Not this specifically, but I use Tailscale for this use-case (as far as I can tell they're similar solutions) and it's fantastic
Re:Wg-access-server: An all-in-one WireGuard VPN solution wi...
by nirav72 on Friday October 01, 2021 @04:36PM
(#28723152)
I second this. Tailscale is great. However, if you're someone that prefers a selfhosted option (and open source) - there is HeadScale. It lets you run your own coordination server locally.
Re:Wg-access-server: An all-in-one WireGuard VPN solution wi...
by probotect0r on Sunday October 03, 2021 @11:47PM
(#28742853)
Unfortunately I can't justify a paid option right now, and I need to be able to support at least 5 to 10 users. Otherwise I would jump on it, it's very good.
Re:Wg-access-server: An all-in-one WireGuard VPN solution wi...
by lostlogin on Friday October 01, 2021 @08:03PM
(#28724733)
Tailscale is incredible in its ease of use. So much so that I got scared and turned it off.
I need to read more then be brave.
Re:Wg-access-server: An all-in-one WireGuard VPN solution wi...
by cybrox on Saturday October 02, 2021 @01:41AM
(#28726250)
Kinda, we've been using wg on multiple servers (~10 atm) across two different networks to aggregate monitoring data from each.
Works like a charm so far, we provision them all via Ansible and use iptables to only allow access to metric endpoints via the wg0 interface.
So far, we haven't had a single issue in 6 months.