News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Societies that treat women badly are poorer and less stable by gmpart on Saturday September 11, 2021 @04:33PM (#28495658)
Catherine the Great, Queen Victoria, Margaret Thatcher, Angela Merkel.

The last one caused the CDU to drop from 40% to 20% in 6 years and is partly responsible for Brexit.

Thatcher has mixed reviews as well.

Re:Societies that treat women badly are poorer and less stable by ben_w on Saturday September 11, 2021 @05:11PM (#28496066)
Merkel has been chancellor for 16 years, and has maintained a longer track record for popularity than any US or UK leader I can remember. She also announced in October 2018 that she wasn’t going to seek a fifth term as Chancellor in the 2021 elections, after which the CDU opinion polls moved very little for 18 months before first going up to 40% for about a year and then going down to 20% now.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_2021_G...

Re:Societies that treat women badly are poorer and less stable by Cyph0n on Saturday September 11, 2021 @04:38PM (#28495717)
> The last one caused the CDU to drop from 40% to 20% in 6 years and is partly responsible for Brexit.

Excellent example of cherry-picking btw.

Re:Societies that treat women badly are poorer and less stable by pizza on Saturday September 11, 2021 @04:36PM (#28495695)
Merkel responsible for Brexit?
Re:Societies that treat women badly are poorer and less stable by bellyfullofbac on Saturday September 11, 2021 @05:16PM (#28496115)
Merkel is horrible for a lot of things, but your example is a terrible one...

She's a conservative, and the conservative economic doctrine is austerity for the masses, but handouts for businesses. She and her economic minister presided over the Euro crisis terribly, causing hardships in Spain, Italy, Greece. People commited suicide because of it! Since Germany was the biggest economy in Europe of course what Berlin said was what Brussels would parrot.

And I'm glad she said Syrians were welcome, but after many years of telling Germans and other Europeans that they needed to tighten their belts, suddenly she said "we can do it!". It's freaking understandable that the people who've been indoctrinated that without the belt-tightening there'll be nothing left for their pensions are pissed off at the idea that several hundred thousand refugees would be fed, clothed, housed, etc, with their tax money.

Again I'm glad she welcomed the refugees, but after spreading austerity doctrine all over Europe, the populist rightwing reaction is understandable. The rightwing party AfD is now a significant fraction in German state and federal parliaments, if you want to be cruel you can say Merkel did a better job of growing Nazism than a certain previuos German leader who had Europe-conquering ambitions..

Re:Societies that treat women badly are poorer and less stable by simonh on Saturday September 11, 2021 @07:08PM (#28496942)
> causing hardships in Spain, Italy, Greece.

FFS. It’s not as if Germany forced those countries to utterly bork their finances. Suppose Germany had said no, were not lending you money, it belongs to our citizens. What would those countries have done, who else would have helped them? The fact is they got better terms from Germany than anywhere else, and what thanks do the Germans get? So glad us Brits stayed out of all of that.

Re:Societies that treat women badly are poorer and less stable by bellyfullofbac on Sunday September 12, 2021 @02:47AM (#28499121)
https://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/29/opinion/29krugman.html , but a register-wall will probably prevent you from learning today (that and your cocksuredness about being sure how things really work).