Or you could just ignore it and move on. Life would be so boring if everything was so bland; corporate and HR approved

Open source is everyday getting more corporate-like. In the old times people would create open source as a hobby, nowadays they're just thinking on how this will appear on the resume.

It’s also wrong. Bad documentation is worse than no documentation because bad documentation can be intentionally misleading

I think the sentiment it was trying to get across is that many projects don't have documentation because the task of creating great documentation may seem daunting, so in a sense just saying at least have something. I'm taking it to mean it's a work in progress, but it could have been worded better, of course.

"- Yo, I don't think we should talk about this

- Come on, why not?

- People might misunderstand what we're tryin' to say, you know?"

Salt'n'Pepa

He’s Russian