It was obviously a poor match for the context ;-)
Imagine a 1x100G WAN with encrypted traffic being routed to each of the 10g links based off of a simple application-specific decision. You can probably route that sort of thing without ever consulting main RAM at all.
Yeah, I'm liking this thing as a server-chip, but not so much a workstation. I think there's a lot of applications where a low-energy use CPU hanging off of high-speed fiber connections could be useful.
But I'm not entirely sure of any application that would benefit from the 16 cores, strangely enough.
Do they like multi-"socket" settings?
The number 32 is important because a stack of boards should look like a Thinking Machines CM-2a (http://www.corestore.org/cm2a.htm) and each CPU would control one LED (or three - Octavo now has a 3-core, two puny, one even punier, part, ending up with only 10 nodes per board).
What kind of crazy NAS / router / appliance thing was this board originally made for?
That being said, having access to 4x10 Gb ports is pretty funny for a computer of this strength, and might be the main selling point of this whole setup (some kind of crazy CDN server or something that's heavily I/O bound?)