Re:Honeycomb LX2 ARM Workstation: An Alternative to x86
by zokier on Friday August 27, 2021 @04:43AM
(#28325596)
Yeah, I was thinking that nevermind workstations, this could be good upgrade from APU2 as a router platform if you want to go beyond 1Gbe. Throw in some pcie wifi adapter (ax210 maybe?) and you got a pretty decent setup
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Honeycomb LX2 ARM Workstation: An Alternative to x86
by linux4kix on Friday August 27, 2021 @06:02AM
(#28325969)
We have a growing lineup of SystemReady ES certified hardware that will make good OSS upgrades. New platforms on our LX2162A based SOM will be especially good for this application.
Re:Honeycomb LX2 ARM Workstation: An Alternative to x86
by detaro on Friday August 27, 2021 @06:04AM
(#28325976)
please make a beefier SOM that fits the MNT Reform, those would be nice to have in a laptop :)
Re:Honeycomb LX2 ARM Workstation: An Alternative to x86
by linux4kix on Friday August 27, 2021 @06:12AM
(#28326016)
We are talking with MNT about possibly building around the LX2162a SOM.
Re:Honeycomb LX2 ARM Workstation: An Alternative to x86
by rbanffy on Friday August 27, 2021 @09:15AM
(#28327414)
What's the difference? The block diagram seems very similar.
Re:Honeycomb LX2 ARM Workstation: An Alternative to x86
by linux4kix on Friday August 27, 2021 @09:32AM
(#28327576)
The core count and network processing is the same, but the number of SERDES lanes is half. This allowed the SOC's die size to be much smaller. You can fit 4 SOMs in the space of a single CEX7 module.
Re:Honeycomb LX2 ARM Workstation: An Alternative to x86
by rbanffy on Friday August 27, 2021 @09:33AM
(#28327595)
> You can fit 4 SOMs in the space of a single CEX7 module.
Do they like multi-"socket" settings?
Re:Honeycomb LX2 ARM Workstation: An Alternative to x86
by linux4kix on Friday August 27, 2021 @09:40AM
(#28327685)
There is no backplane for the CPUs no. But they support 10 and 25Gbps networking that can be used for high speed clustering.
Re:Honeycomb LX2 ARM Workstation: An Alternative to x86
by rbanffy on Friday August 27, 2021 @11:04AM
(#28328774)
Now that you mention that, it's quite an upgrade over my idea of putting 32 Octavo easy to interface packages (you need to connect like 5 balls for what I want) along with a ethernet switch and make a cluster of 32 puny nodes...
The number 32 is important because a stack of boards should look like a Thinking Machines CM-2a (http://www.corestore.org/cm2a.htm) and each CPU would control one LED (or three - Octavo now has a 3-core, two puny, one even punier, part, ending up with only 10 nodes per board).