News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Gill Dyslexic — a $2 dyslexic font based on the work behi... by skrebbel on Thursday July 28, 2011 @02:59AM (#2815713)
The text uses the term "research" with respect to Dyslexie. The only research performed was an M.Sc. thesis that showed that it is slightly easier to read than Arial.
Re:Gill Dyslexic — a $2 dyslexic font based on the work behi... by gus_massa on Thursday July 28, 2011 @03:12PM (#2818440)
In the thesis, it was not clear that the new font was easier to read than Arial.

[From a comment I made in the original submission.]

I read the tables in the thesis. There are 12 comparations between the Arial and the Dyslexie fonts, but only 2 of then have p<.1 and none of them has p<.05. So it is very difficult to know if the differences between the fonts are real or come from random noise.

Re:Gill Dyslexic — a $2 dyslexic font based on the work behi... by ristretto on Thursday July 28, 2011 @04:43AM (#2815915)
I would be interested to see more related research too. We spend far too much time reading text so even a slight increase in readability is important, even for non-dyslexics
Re:Gill Dyslexic — a $2 dyslexic font based on the work behi... by pixelscript on Thursday July 28, 2011 @10:20AM (#2816877)
I would like to do research on my font too, I don't have any academic links or funds for it though.
Re:Gill Dyslexic — a $2 dyslexic font based on the work behi... by dlss on Friday July 29, 2011 @02:25PM (#2823106)
I know this isn't the place for this, but I wanted to make sure you saw this...

For me, your Mono_Dyslexic font is life changing.

That is all.

Re:Gill Dyslexic — a $2 dyslexic font based on the work behi... by pixelscript on Saturday July 30, 2011 @08:08PM (#2827166)
I'm really glad you like it. Can I quote you as a testimonial?