Re:Gill Dyslexic — a $2 dyslexic font based on the work behi...
by skrebbel on Thursday July 28, 2011 @02:59AM
(#2815713)
The text uses the term "research" with respect to Dyslexie. The only research performed was an M.Sc. thesis that showed that it is slightly easier to read than Arial.
Re:Gill Dyslexic — a $2 dyslexic font based on the work behi...
by gus_massa on Thursday July 28, 2011 @03:12PM
(#2818440)
In the thesis, it was not clear that the new font was easier to read than Arial.
[From a comment I made in the original submission.]
I read the tables in the thesis. There are 12 comparations between the Arial and the Dyslexie fonts, but only 2 of then have p<.1 and none of them has p<.05. So it is very difficult to know if the differences between the fonts are real or come from random noise.
Re:Gill Dyslexic — a $2 dyslexic font based on the work behi...
by ristretto on Thursday July 28, 2011 @04:43AM
(#2815915)
I would be interested to see more related research too. We spend far too much time reading text so even a slight increase in readability is important, even for non-dyslexics
Re:Gill Dyslexic — a $2 dyslexic font based on the work behi...
by petercooper on Thursday July 28, 2011 @03:04AM
(#2815725)
My dyslexic wife just found it unnerving but that doesn't mean it's not better in practice :-) I found it odd, myself, it seems to "move" about, which is weird since I'm not dyslexic and am fine with ordinary type. Almost like the situation has been reversed!
Re:Gill Dyslexic — a $2 dyslexic font based on the work behi...
by fragsworth on Thursday July 28, 2011 @04:45AM
(#2815919)
I had the same problem, but I think I may have been biased by the title and expected a "dyslexic font" to be difficult to read, so as I read it, it seemed very weird.
Re:Gill Dyslexic — a $2 dyslexic font based on the work behi...
by stefanve on Thursday July 28, 2011 @03:31AM
(#2815786)
It looks a bit to much like comic sans to me (aka ugly :) ). Normally I just make the text bigger, that seems to work pretty good as well. I would pay up to 50E for a good looking font based on this idea
edit:
I had 2$ to spare and it seems to work. it is easier for me to read with this font. not sure if it is better than time new romans
Re:Gill Dyslexic — a $2 dyslexic font based on the work behi...
by _phred on Thursday July 28, 2011 @04:23AM
(#2815881)
I sent the author a note asking about that, and whether or not he'd be willing to license under a Creative Commons or similar. If this technique works for dyslexics, then it'd be great to have a free version out there!
Re:Gill Dyslexic — a $2 dyslexic font based on the work behi...
by lawlit on Thursday July 28, 2011 @10:00AM
(#2816801)
I find it quiet greedy and tightwad to ask for money for this thing, for 2 reasons:
1) It will help sick people.
2) It's based on other people research.
EDIT: think about those who made great software (Linux, emacs, etc.) and made it available for everyone, for free, and think about a guy who ask 2$ for a font that might help sick people.
Re:Gill Dyslexic — a $2 dyslexic font based on the work behi...
by Alterlife on Thursday July 28, 2011 @03:00AM
(#2815715)
I did find it easier to read... but I really wonder how much of the effect comes from the size of the sample text. It's huge!
The scaled down version is a little harder to read: http://imgur.com/Xh3Mt. (ctrl + mousewheel to resize the image on the page direct)... and here again, I'm not sure how much of the difficulty to read the smaller version comes because of quality lost from scaling.
It would be nice to see a screen-shot the font as it is rendered in a smaller typeface.
[From a comment I made in the original submission.]
I read the tables in the thesis. There are 12 comparations between the Arial and the Dyslexie fonts, but only 2 of then have p<.1 and none of them has p<.05. So it is very difficult to know if the differences between the fonts are real or come from random noise.
For me, your Mono_Dyslexic font is life changing.
That is all.
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2815786
But I'm not dyslexic.
I was looking for a font like this after seeing this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VLtYFcHx7ec. Two dollar is a steal!
edit: I had 2$ to spare and it seems to work. it is easier for me to read with this font. not sure if it is better than time new romans
edit2:
screen shots in smaller font http://imgur.com/a/HEADE
last one is original for reference. original text: http://www.economist.com/node/18958397
Could I use this on a webpage?
EDIT: think about those who made great software (Linux, emacs, etc.) and made it available for everyone, for free, and think about a guy who ask 2$ for a font that might help sick people.
To me, this font just looks like Comic Sans. I see no added benefit in terms of readability.
The scaled down version is a little harder to read: http://imgur.com/Xh3Mt. (ctrl + mousewheel to resize the image on the page direct)... and here again, I'm not sure how much of the difficulty to read the smaller version comes because of quality lost from scaling.
It would be nice to see a screen-shot the font as it is rendered in a smaller typeface.
http://imgur.com/a/HEADE
last one is original for reference. original text: http://www.economist.com/node/18958397
http://www.pixelscript.net/gilldyslexic/demo.html