Re:Gill Dyslexic — a $2 dyslexic font based on the work behi...
by gus_massa on Thursday July 28, 2011 @03:12PM
(#2818440)
In the thesis, it was not clear that the new font was easier to read than Arial.
[From a comment I made in the original submission.]
I read the tables in the thesis. There are 12 comparations between the Arial and the Dyslexie fonts, but only 2 of then have p<.1 and none of them has p<.05. So it is very difficult to know if the differences between the fonts are real or come from random noise.
[From a comment I made in the original submission.]
I read the tables in the thesis. There are 12 comparations between the Arial and the Dyslexie fonts, but only 2 of then have p<.1 and none of them has p<.05. So it is very difficult to know if the differences between the fonts are real or come from random noise.