https://londonist.com/london/food-and-drink/until-recently-l...
https://unherd.com/2020/01/what-has-the-new-york-times-got-a...
This weird inability to reflect reality I see day-to-day coupled with the insistence on anti-patterns of behaviour for those cancelling their subscriptions has prevented me from taking out a sub to the NYT. That's a shame, as some of the articles are great.
That one news article was a subject of intense discussion at the time which quickly became politicized. A decent overview of the discussion can be found at
https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/business/prescot-makes-...
For what it's worth, I wholly subscribe to the OP's viewpoint that the NY times' reports from France have been subpar in recent months - in my view they have been too Americo-Centric and do not sufficiently recognize the different value system in France. But I have often been positively surprised by the paper's reporting on UK issues (and on Brexit in particular).
Not for a long time.
>And their sporting culture seems even more Leroy Jenkins than that in the US.
Currently 6th in the medal table for the Olympics.
https://www.latimes.com/food/la-fo-nyc-restaurant-scene-apri...
Absolutely brilliant article IMO
Not the NYT, but I still remember the "No go zones" CNN boasted about. [0] [1]
I still remember French co-workers having a good laugh at it. It's tough to fact-check anything when you don't speak the language.
[0] https://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2015/01/cnn-apologizes-...
[1] https://www.cnn.com/videos/tv/2015/01/21/natpkg-look-at-pari...
It’s not just you. You are waking up from the gell-mann amnesia.
This seems like just the latest (and fairly mild) episode of this, but it's still a bit puzzling to me as a former (sort of) journalist to see so much editorialising, and in this case, an utter lack of facts and context.
There's not much on the goals behind that pass, the impact of covid on many of the other options, or any background on the local "bd" culture that would explain the difference to the US comics culture to the reader. The title certainly doesn't help.
At that point I don't know if I'm just getting more picky with time, but the fact to editorialising ratio in the NYT seem to have shifted to, at least to me, a fairly uncomfortable level pretty much every time I stumble onto one of their articles.