I already asked upthread, but since this is here: how do you intend to insure this? For example, how do you insure that minors who have this app installed by their parents or guardians will be able to remove or bypass it, particularly without the parent being able to detect that (and thereby prevent it via threats)?
Also, it seems rather strange to me that you focus on porn when social media is a bigger problem.
But that's probably because of my own bias, I've been trying to quit Reddit and other garbage for years.
regarding social media - that's next on our list! porn was the 1st use case and we plan to help people limit social media and gaming in the coming years.
You're not sorry.
"Don't feed egregious comments by replying; flag them instead."
Wait, so you claim it of people who want to quit unspecified "hard drugs", but not alcohol specifically? Attendance to alcoholics anonymous is voluntary (usually, though sometimes a court compels it.) Use of this application is also voluntary. So what's the fundamental difference here?
> groups (esp religious ‘addiction’ services) _organizing_
If this is really key to what you're getting at, then it makes no sense for you to exclude Alcoholics Anonymous from your ire since that is an organized group that is religion-adjacent if not outright religious.
It’s about the people that are building structures to enforce their own morality and dressing it up as helping addiction. Those that prey on those wanting to quit.
You mean, applications that people voluntarily choose to use? You still haven't pointed out any authoritarianism from Atmana.