News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SF's crime debate turns nasty by refurb on Wednesday July 07, 2021 @07:41AM (#27759917)
Chesa and his predecessor Gascon were not just trying out the “let’s not put people in jail” to see if it works, this is a core tenant of their political beliefs and if the population at large has to pay a price, so be it. This is not a slight adjustment to the justice system, this is a “burn it down and build something else” approach - an attempt to dismantle a system, they claim, is built on systemic racism. If a couple of law-abiding citizens get run over and killed by a repeated offender in a stolen car, then that’s a sacrifice Chesa is willing to make.

So to answer your question, there is no compromise because compromise would be admitting failure - that these policies don’t work. And also admitting that putting some people in jail is a net benefit to society.

Re:SF's crime debate turns nasty by 6f8986c3 on Wednesday July 07, 2021 @07:45AM (#27759951)
Correct.
Re:SF's crime debate turns nasty by SyzygistSix on Wednesday July 07, 2021 @09:00AM (#27760612)
When poverty, homelessness, and desperation increase, so does crime and theft. And these politicians are correct in that we cannot jail our way out of this problem. Not jailing people doesn't work but neither does jailing them. At least one of these policies doesn't waste money, incarcerate people, and puts the responsibility on the store owners.