News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:ATM NFC Hack by FounderBurr on Saturday June 26, 2021 @10:37PM (#27648025)
If you can’t be trusted to handle basic, simple non-creative tasks like managing memory and buffers you are not actually a professional programmer, though you might have convinced an employer otherwise.
Re:ATM NFC Hack by paavohtl on Sunday June 27, 2021 @04:49AM (#27649799)
By this logic no C or C++ developer in history is a professional programmer. Approximately zero non-trivial programs have been written in C or C++ without memory management problems and/or vulnerabilities.
Re:ATM NFC Hack by junon on Sunday June 27, 2021 @06:00AM (#27650148)
That's an ignorant and wrong assertion, spoken with an incredible amount of confidence.

Look up software verification. There are verifiers for C.

Re:ATM NFC Hack by omegalulw on Sunday June 27, 2021 @07:21PM (#27656409)
This is misleading. Formally verifying the behaviour of any large software is a really tall task, no matter what language they are written in.
Re:ATM NFC Hack by junon on Friday July 02, 2021 @10:18PM (#27718854)
That's not what the parent comment asserted though.
Re:ATM NFC Hack by wmf on Saturday June 26, 2021 @11:53PM (#27648429)
Often it's the employer encouraging the programmers to cut corners.
Re:ATM NFC Hack by jbverschoor on Sunday June 27, 2021 @05:18AM (#27649954)
With a lot of things I agree with this statement, but not about memory management in C.

It's the "fault" of the programmer, but the language makes it very easy to make these faults, so I'd say it's the fault of the language.

Re:ATM NFC Hack by bottled_poe on Sunday June 27, 2021 @02:24AM (#27649112)
No, it’s the market.