Re:El Salvador to airdrop $30 in Bitcoin to up to 6M citizens
by varajelle on Friday June 25, 2021 @12:34PM
(#27633024)
You can route through your pair. Say A has a channel with B, B has a channel with C and C has a channel with D, you can make payment between A and D provided that B and C are online. In a way that nobody can steal money from one another, and neither B not D know who is paying who.
In practice, B and C would probably be like banks or exchanges, with many channels, while normal users only need one channel open.
Re:El Salvador to airdrop $30 in Bitcoin to up to 6M citizens
by rocqua on Friday June 25, 2021 @04:56PM
(#27636172)
True, and in fact lightning payments tend to take many hops if routed publically.
But every citizen would still need atleast one lightning channel. And opening those is expensive.
Re:El Salvador to airdrop $30 in Bitcoin to up to 6M citizens
by narrator on Friday June 25, 2021 @10:52PM
(#27638625)
The lightning channel would go through a custodial wallet. Yes, people could self host their own wallets, but fees would be higher because they'd have to open a lightning channel.
Re:El Salvador to airdrop $30 in Bitcoin to up to 6M citizens
by thehappypm on Friday June 25, 2021 @02:04PM
(#27634272)
So you need something centralized for it to actually work.
However, the first transaction between a specific pair (channel opening) still needs to occur on-chain. That transaction still pays a full fee.