News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google+ can now hide your gender "in response to user fee... by hammock on Wednesday July 13, 2011 @10:05AM (#2758979)
Ctrl-H Find and Replace doesn't seem all that hard.
Re:Google+ can now hide your gender "in response to user fee... by jerf on Wednesday July 13, 2011 @12:35PM (#2759505)
http://search.cpan.org/~toddr/Locale-Maketext-1.19/lib/Local... - which is an article, not a CPAN module, despite its hosting. Localization isn't "find and replace" easy, it's a nightmare.
Re:Google+ can now hide your gender "in response to user fee... by jarek on Wednesday July 13, 2011 @10:18AM (#2759011)
Not all languages will be as simple as s/his/their/ and s/her/their/.
Re:Google+ can now hide your gender "in response to user fee... by afterburner on Wednesday July 13, 2011 @11:01AM (#2759155)
I read somewhere that other languages had more neutral gender splits, or simply all-masculine ones, to make things easier for now. So it could be in other languages they had nothing to reverse yet.
Re:Google+ can now hide your gender "in response to user fee... by sheffield on Wednesday July 13, 2011 @10:32AM (#2759070)
But in English it is. It's acceptable to develop faster for certain (popular) languages.
Re:Google+ can now hide your gender "in response to user fee... by jarek on Wednesday July 13, 2011 @10:36AM (#2759088)
Absolutely, but I would be surprised if they didn't have some code in the production version right now to support doubtlessly upcoming translated versions - perhaps not a full blown declension engine, but it seems unlikely they'd go English only at the start and retrofit everything later. The code might not be optimized to just let them do a simple find/replace for English.
Re:Google+ can now hide your gender "in response to user fee... by sheffield on Wednesday July 13, 2011 @10:56AM (#2759143)
The problem of translation should not affect the writing of the original text.
Re:Google+ can now hide your gender "in response to user fee... by jarek on Wednesday July 13, 2011 @11:03AM (#2759165)
For all you know, the "original text" is a mix of "foo bar" and lolspeak.