Re:Google+ can now hide your gender "in response to user fee...
by hammock on Wednesday July 13, 2011 @10:05AM
(#2758979)
Ctrl-H Find and Replace doesn't seem all that hard.
Re:Google+ can now hide your gender "in response to user fee...
by jerf on Wednesday July 13, 2011 @12:35PM
(#2759505)
http://search.cpan.org/~toddr/Locale-Maketext-1.19/lib/Local... - which is an article, not a CPAN module, despite its hosting. Localization isn't "find and replace" easy, it's a nightmare.
Re:Google+ can now hide your gender "in response to user fee...
by jarek on Wednesday July 13, 2011 @10:18AM
(#2759011)
Not all languages will be as simple as s/his/their/ and s/her/their/.
Re:Google+ can now hide your gender "in response to user fee...
by afterburner on Wednesday July 13, 2011 @11:01AM
(#2759155)
I read somewhere that other languages had more neutral gender splits, or simply all-masculine ones, to make things easier for now. So it could be in other languages they had nothing to reverse yet.
Re:Google+ can now hide your gender "in response to user fee...
by sheffield on Wednesday July 13, 2011 @10:32AM
(#2759070)
But in English it is. It's acceptable to develop faster for certain (popular) languages.
Re:Google+ can now hide your gender "in response to user fee...
by jarek on Wednesday July 13, 2011 @10:36AM
(#2759088)
Absolutely, but I would be surprised if they didn't have some code in the production version right now to support doubtlessly upcoming translated versions - perhaps not a full blown declension engine, but it seems unlikely they'd go English only at the start and retrofit everything later. The code might not be optimized to just let them do a simple find/replace for English.
Re:Google+ can now hide your gender "in response to user fee...
by sheffield on Wednesday July 13, 2011 @10:56AM
(#2759143)
The problem of translation should not affect the writing of the original text.
Re:Google+ can now hide your gender "in response to user fee...
by jarek on Wednesday July 13, 2011 @11:03AM
(#2759165)
For all you know, the "original text" is a mix of "foo bar" and lolspeak.
"One of the major things we use gender information for on Google+ is for picking gender pronouns - her, his, theirs - when we refer to you. Google is committed to building products that people all over the world use, and in some languages gender is much more deeply part of how sentences are formed than in say, English. Having gender information helps to make Google+ more conversational. If you decide to make your gender private on Google+, we'll to use gender-neutral language to describe you whenever someone else encounters gender-related information about you but doesn't have permission to see your gender. For example, instead of saying 'Greg added you to his circles' or 'Frances added you to her circles', we'll say 'Greg added you to their circles' or 'Frances added you to their circles'. Yes, I know this is grammatically questionable. You don't need to message me about it. We value helping people control their privacy as being much more important than being grammatically perfectly."