Re:China lands rover on Mars
by M_bara on Friday May 14, 2021 @11:51PM
(#27162181)
Not to pour water on your statement, I'd say that the rate of change counts more. Nailing your first landing attempt on a powered descent (rocket-crate equivalent) is no mean feat. I'm actually pleasantly surprised given the high failure rate of Mars missions.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
[dead]
Hey man, congrats on the new job.
Re:China lands rover on Mars
by hungryhobo on Saturday May 15, 2021 @12:28AM
(#27162366)
i think the difference is that only 2 countries have successfully landed on Mars while the amount of people earning 120k is quite high
Four governmental organizations have landed on Mars. Can’t forget the Russians and Europeans did it first. But that’s besides the point because I provided a hyperbole where my rate of change was significant but not newsworthy. We aren’t celebrating them because they went from there the fastest but because they went there at all. How fast isn’t noteworthy because they’re standing on the shoulders of giants. They literally copied the design of our rover from 20 years ago and I wouldn’t be surprised if they had stolen a lot of those tech specs from nasa long ago
Re:China lands rover on Mars
by idiotsecant on Saturday May 15, 2021 @12:31AM
(#27162383)
I'd agree rate of change counts more if both parties were at comparable technology levels. When you're still playing catchup there's a lot of opportunities to take certain engineering shortcuts.
100% agree, like hiring Nazi scientists to kickstart your space program.