News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:PfSense – WireGuard Returns as Experimental Package by SigmundA on Sunday May 09, 2021 @10:00AM (#27095948)
Probably because Scott Long considers Jason Donenfield an "attacker" of PfSense, FreeBSD and Netgate:

https://www.netgate.com/blog/painful-lessons-learned-in-secu...

Re:PfSense – WireGuard Returns as Experimental Package by frickinLasers on Sunday May 09, 2021 @10:20AM (#27096092)
Ars Technica wrote a report on the debacle[1], and I've since stopped using pfsense. I was already on the fence following their move away from open-source with "pfSense Plus"[2].

[1] https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/03/buffer-overruns-lice...

[2] https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Netgate-...

Re:PfSense – WireGuard Returns as Experimental Package by forcemajeure on Sunday May 09, 2021 @11:05AM (#27096541)

  "you either have a commit bit (enabling you to commit code to FreeBSD's repositories) or you don't. It's hard to find code reviews, and there generally isn't a fixed process ensuring that vitally important code gets reviewed prior to inclusion"
Doesn't sound very professional!
Re:PfSense – WireGuard Returns as Experimental Package by screamingninja on Sunday May 09, 2021 @11:26AM (#27096743)
> I've since stopped using pfsense

I find myself in the same boat. What do you use/recommend instead?

Re:PfSense – WireGuard Returns as Experimental Package by seized on Sunday May 09, 2021 @11:40AM (#27096877)
OpnSense has long been the better option. It forked from pfsense years ago and has been better for a long time. Netgate engaged in some shameful behavior after the fork, their mistreatment of Jason isn't their first instance.
Re:PfSense – WireGuard Returns as Experimental Package by kayson on Sunday May 09, 2021 @12:04PM (#27097090)
The only thing holding me back from opnsense is that there's no pfblockerng...
Re:PfSense – WireGuard Returns as Experimental Package by 0x000000E2 on Sunday May 09, 2021 @03:22PM (#27098872)
I'm an OpenWrt hawk, they have a plugin for DNS based blocking if you end up going that direction https://github.com/openwrt/packages/tree/master/net/adblock/...
Re:PfSense – WireGuard Returns as Experimental Package by eddyg on Sunday May 09, 2021 @03:06PM (#27098717)
AdGuard Home is in the OPNsense community repo and a very nice alternative: https://www.routerperformance.net/opnsense-repo/
Re:PfSense – WireGuard Returns as Experimental Package by LeoPanthera on Sunday May 09, 2021 @01:45PM (#27097961)
I don't use opnsense but a quick google revealed the following, is this not functionally the same?

https://www.cjross.net/dns-security-and-adblock-with-opnsens...

Re:PfSense – WireGuard Returns as Experimental Package by seized on Sunday May 09, 2021 @03:17PM (#27098828)
Unbound has a block list feature and there are several other options. None are quite to the same level as far as I know, but the rest of OpnSense makes up for it.
Re:PfSense – WireGuard Returns as Experimental Package by azinman2 on Sunday May 09, 2021 @01:09PM (#27097659)
I thought opnsense had various issues too? I can’t remember what, exactly, but perhaps it was around security or performance?
Re:PfSense – WireGuard Returns as Experimental Package by seized on Sunday May 09, 2021 @03:19PM (#27098850)
None that I have ever heard of. It uses HardenedBSD but they're dropping that soonish.
Re:PfSense – WireGuard Returns as Experimental Package by azinman2 on Sunday May 09, 2021 @09:28PM (#27101706)
Maybe that’s what I’m thinking about. Seems early then to adopt?

Aside from community and WireGuard issues, any reason to abandon a working pfsense install?

Re:PfSense – WireGuard Returns as Experimental Package by kevans91 on Sunday May 09, 2021 @10:19PM (#27102022)
I personally don't see the need, pfSense is rock-solid for my uses.
Re:PfSense – WireGuard Returns as Experimental Package by efxhoy on Sunday May 09, 2021 @03:40PM (#27099036)
I'm in the same boat. As soon as I find time I'm nuking my pfsense router and installing OpenBSD. I just need it to do NAT, DHCP and always work. I don't need a fancy web-ui, traffic graphs or anything like that, I thought I did when I installed pfsense ~10 years ago but the only time I've logged in for any reason was when it stopped working for some reason (usually the ISP's fault).

OpenBSD's history is impeccable and I really don't want to have to think about my router after initial setup other than installing updates once in a while.

Re:PfSense – WireGuard Returns as Experimental Package by 0x000000E2 on Sunday May 09, 2021 @03:19PM (#27098842)
I swear by OpenWrt. It's not just for wifi routers. It's a regular Linux distro you can run on X86 too.

My favorite thing about OpenWrt is SQM CAKE, state of the art traffic shaping. A panacea for slow links

Re:PfSense – WireGuard Returns as Experimental Package by kryptn on Sunday May 09, 2021 @01:23PM (#27097779)
Not me personally, but I have a couple friends that have started using VyOS and they seem pretty satisfied.

https://vyos.io/

Re:PfSense – WireGuard Returns as Experimental Package by Marsymars on Sunday May 09, 2021 @06:46PM (#27100550)
For my home use, I just switched to an Eero device. Not quite the same product categories, but my priority was software security, meaning that there are a very small number of workable options for home use.
Re:PfSense – WireGuard Returns as Experimental Package by _joel on Sunday May 09, 2021 @11:30AM (#27096785)